Teams

LWR Not Navas Players

2024 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-04Split 11
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Linda Radovich5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Martina Kralickova vs Christine Tocco / Avis Brodess2-6, 4-6
2024-05-28vs LWN RomanoLost 12
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Leslie Kornaker6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarcia Frost / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Natalie Bloch / Elsa Trefil3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Moore / Karen Patchell vs Wanda Gilbert / Meredith Poppler2-6, 5-7
2024-05-21vs Plantation DipierroLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Kathy Lewis vs Ana Areosa / Connie Weiss1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Marjorie Petruccelli2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Moore / Karen Patchell vs Ellen Lori Smith MD / Nora Saxe1-6, 1-6
2024-05-14vs LBK Public SchonhoffSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Anna Seal vs Karen Kurgan / Rhonda Snow2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Lewis / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Ginger Griffith-Schirmer / Betsy Tavernier6-4, 6-3
2024-05-07vs Laurel Oak RosenthalSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Caryn Carnevale5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Martina Kralickova vs Danielle Thorpe / Teri Sayre4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-30vs GT Bray RacquettesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartina Kralickova / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Judith Lubbers / Mary Hennessy5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-23vs LWR Rain RanchersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartina Kralickova / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Donna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Betty Jo Zeigler3-6, 4-6
2024-04-16vs Mission Valley Mooney/AbleWon 20
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Jennifer Jaworski6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Martina Kralickova vs Lori Clark / Halle Ghose3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-09Split 11
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Michelle Swartz6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMartina Kralickova / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Cathy Pizzo / Cherie Lopez1-6, 3-6
2024-04-02vs LWR McAloonLost 02
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Carol Frazier1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Martina Kralickova vs Sandy Severs / Lauren Larkin3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Lauren Feingold Navas
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.72
Abigail Stephens
published 4
3.72
Martina Kralickova
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.56
Karen Patchell
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.42
Marcia Frost
published
Kathy Lewis
published
Regina Bussing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Feingold Navas + Martina Kralickova12953% games+10.9% vs expected
Svetlana Janglin + Martina Kralickova8456% games−5.0% vs expected
Martina Kralickova + Karen Patchell6267% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Janglin + Karen Patchell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · 12 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Abigail Stephens
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Martina Kralickova
91W–63L career · 10 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Karen Patchell
87W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
Kathy Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Regina Bussing
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.