Teams

UPTA55A/Michalovsky/The Reserve

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-16vs UPTA55A/Lawson/HollyTreeWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Smentek / Stephanie Mitchell vs Bonita Clark / Sandra Wright6-4, 6-4
2025-04-09vs UPTA55A/Tougaw/KeoweeKeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKay King / Kathy Mendel vs Lisa Weinstein / Nancy Lenkowski5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCandice Limousin / Kathleen Eginton vs Eileen Simollardes / Kaleen Dixon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Michalovsky / Kathleen Stetson vs Susan Bales / Susan Kaurloto2-6, 5-7
2025-04-02vs UPTA55A/Tassin/Keowee KeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCandice Limousin / Kathy Mendel vs Kirsten Zinkann / Annette Aldridge5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDebra Michalovsky / Kay King vs Susan Dougherty / Lisa Murphy4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary O'Connell / Kathleen Stetson vs Muriel Rankin / Lorra Tassin3-6, 1-6
2025-03-26vs UPTA55A/Wilson/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesBobbi Nailor / Mary McCarthy vs Lee Ann Wilson / Linda Musgrave6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCandice Limousin / Kathy Mendel vs Chimene Evans / Deborah B Bowyer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Eginton / Alleta McKeon vs Kelley Golden / Kelly Shuler7-5, 6-4
2025-03-19vs UPTA55A/Riley/GCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Evanski / Kathy Mendel vs Suzanne Massey Schemm / Angela Einstein4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKay King / Candice Limousin vs Jennifer Infinger / Rhonda Riley1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathleen Eginton / Debra Michalovsky vs Cami Madden / Jane Schipper0-6, 2-6
2025-03-12vs UPTA55A/Lawson/HollyTreeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary McCarthy / Lisa Apsey vs Gretchen Lawson / Lea Blanchard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBobbi Nailor / Kim Smentek vs Diane Zeager / Colleen Rostek6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlleta McKeon / Kay King vs Melanie DeWitt / Susan San Francisco6-3, 6-0
2025-03-11vs UPTA55A/Tougaw/KeoweeKeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary McCarthy / Stephanie Mitchell vs Nancy Lenkowski / Tish Fontana2-6, 1-6
2025-02-27vs UPTA55A/Wilson/BrookstoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary McCarthy / Stephanie Mitchell vs Lee Ann Wilson / Linda Musgrave7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-18vs UPTA55A/Riley/GCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Evanski / Stephanie Mitchell vs Jennifer Infinger / Melissa Richardson6-2, 6-1
2025-02-05vs UPTA55A/Tassin/Keowee KeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Eginton / Stephanie Mitchell vs Katrina Prala / Muriel Rankin1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Bobbi Nailor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Lisa Apsey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Kim Smentek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Stephanie Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.81
Michele Evanski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Kay King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Alleta McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Candice Limousin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Kathy Mendel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.19
Kathleen Stetson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Debra Michalovsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kathleen Eginton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Smentek + Bobbi Nailor6260% games+5.3% vs expected
Kay King + Candice Limousin2348% games−10.0% vs expected
Kathy Mendel + Candice Limousin2443% games−10.0% vs expected
Debra Michalovsky + Kathleen Stetson0523% gamesnot enough data
Kim Smentek + Michele Evanski123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Mendel + Michele Evanski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bobbi Nailor
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Lisa Apsey
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kim Smentek
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Stephanie Mitchell
18W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Michele Evanski
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kay King
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Alleta McKeon
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Candice Limousin
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kathy Mendel
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Kathleen Stetson
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Debra Michalovsky
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Kathleen Eginton
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Lewis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.