Teams

1. May

2025 NO LEAGUE · ADMIN USE ONLY

26 players · average NTRP 3.71 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for ADMIN USE ONLY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Jeffrey Fowle
published 4.5
4.05
Ashley Pietryka
published 4.5
3.98
3.95
Johnny Hsiung
published 4
3.73
Ele Pratt
published 4
3.72
Michael Erdely
published 4
3.67
Ellen McLaughlin
published
3.55
Deborah Greenside
published 3.5
3.55
Dennis Weikel
published 3.5
3.52
Jodi Murray
published
3.48
Syed Hamza Ahmad
published
3.42
Elliot Rogers
published
3.33
Allison Mathis
published 3.5
3.33
Millicent Audain
published 3.5
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.31
Vy Nguyen
published
3.25
Aklil Getachew
published 3.5
3.20
Claire Kim
published 3.5
3.17
Stephen Owen
published
3.16
Karin Davis
published
2.99
Amy Champion
published 3
Amy Lamont
published 3
2.38
Kim Piasecki
published
Joe Bae
published
Laura Bull
published
Prannoy Namala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Fowle + Michael Erdely134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jeffrey Fowle
182W–104L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Ashley Pietryka
129W–59L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Nichole Hauswirth
124W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Johnny Hsiung
573W–156L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Ele Pratt
102W–79L career · type M · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Michael Erdely
206W–159L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Ellen McLaughlin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Jodi Murray
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Syed Hamza Ahmad
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Elliot Rogers
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Allison Mathis
73W–34L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Millicent Audain
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Vy Nguyen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Aklil Getachew
115W–108L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Claire Kim
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Stephen Owen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Karin Davis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Amy Champion
29W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Amy Lamont
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Piasecki
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Joe Bae
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Bull
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Prannoy Namala
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.