Teams

CP:Mixed Signals:das Neves/Pon

2022 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed - 1

22 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesSusanna Nichols / Paul Kissner vs Mark Hatfield / Kerstin Lebel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesThane Benedict / Heather Parenti vs Gregory Francis / Ayo Haynes6-0, 6-4
2022-06-04vs 4S:Mixed 40+ 8.0:Biele/SmeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmilie Chang / Edgar Torres vs Melissa Edwards / Yoonho Park7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLawrence Green / Sylvia Swanson vs Heide Marie Bliss / Richard Long1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesThane Benedict / Heather Parenti vs Michele Miller / Gregory Morley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-20vs MIT:Senior Bulldogs:DellacroceLost 12
L#1 DoublesRussvelt Vyas / Amy Salley vs Chris Harder / Salam Turki3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrigitte Tanner / Thane Benedict vs Donald Hoover / Amanda Weber1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEdgar Torres / Susanna Nichols vs Brian Dore / Denise Sousa6-3, 6-4
2022-05-14vs INT:Keep it Deep:Ryan/BrozekLost 03
L#1 DoublesLesley MacLeod / Russvelt Vyas vs Stefanie Lemcke / Jay Bockhaus1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmilie Chang / Edgar Torres vs Monica Ryan / Jeffrey Brozek6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeri Cameron / Rudy Loyero vs Christina Scherwin / Atiba Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
2022-04-25vs SOL:Public Enemy #1:SpennerLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Pon / Paul Kissner vs Dorothy Spenner / Wulf Lueckerath3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Feeley / Edgar Torres vs Julia Cho / Eddie Demirci5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrigitte Tanner / Peter Sosnow vs Senta Cassell / Bobby Choe5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-09vs KH:Breaking Back:SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeri Cameron / Russvelt Vyas vs Cintia Shiro / Vijayan Pandalai2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Parenti / Thane Benedict vs Dan Langlois / Jennifer Weitz6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Salley / Darren Senzon vs Sharon Casey / Todd Ertel6-2, 6-2
2022-04-02vs SOL:Mixed Nuts:Dorais/ChunLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmilie Chang / Edgar Torres vs Helen Chun / Hector Rodriguez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThane Benedict / Heather Parenti vs Robert Chun / Sarah Liddle6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichi Tremonte / Russvelt Vyas vs Xiaoran Liang / Jorge Linero3-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs MRC:Court Jesters:O'DonnellLost 03
L#1 DoublesLesley MacLeod / Peter Sosnow vs Ellen O'Donnell / Zine Mazouzi3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Salley / Darren Senzon vs Lillan Hope / Glenn Lavallee3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Das Neves / Russvelt Vyas vs David Miles / Julie Sterling2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 8.0 Mixed - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14S:Mixed 40+ 8.0:Biele/Smey0716517169
2MIT:Senior Bulldogs:Dellacroce0713818157
3MRC:Court Jesters:O'Donnell0791226200
4KH:Breaking Back:Smith0761533219
5INT:Keep it Deep:Ryan/Brozek0820412150
6SOL:Public Enemy #1:Spenner0820413167
7SOL:Mixed Nuts:Dorais/Chun0881636260
8CP:Mixed Signals:das Neves/Pon0861837243
9TC:Between the Lines:Sookvaree/Stasko0842041265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alison Feeley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Paul Kissner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Lawrence Green
published
3.98
Emilie Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Lesley MacLeod
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Tatiane Canady
published
3.80
Edgar Torres
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Russvelt Vyas
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Darren Senzon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Peter Sosnow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Amy Salley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Rudy Loyero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Susanna Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Brigitte Tanner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Maria Das Neves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Sylvia Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Christine Pon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Heather Parenti
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Keri Cameron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Grewal
published
Michi Tremonte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thane Benedict
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanna Nichols + Edgar Torres11557% games+3.2% vs expected
Christine Pon + Paul Kissner4550% games+1.5% vs expected
Emilie Chang + Edgar Torres2351% games+1.1% vs expected
Lesley MacLeod + Peter Sosnow4250% games−4.3% vs expected
Sylvia Swanson + Lawrence Green1836% games−12.3% vs expected
Maria Das Neves + Peter Sosnow224 matchesnot enough data
Thane Benedict + Heather Parenti224 matchesnot enough data
Brigitte Tanner + Peter Sosnow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alison Feeley
40W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Paul Kissner
107W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Lawrence Green
52W–61L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
4.5
Emilie Chang
232W–144L career · 3 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Lesley MacLeod
121W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Tatiane Canady
54W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Edgar Torres
177W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Russvelt Vyas
110W–135L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Darren Senzon
39W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Peter Sosnow
138W–119L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Amy Salley
28W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Rudy Loyero
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
Susanna Nichols
225W–190L career · 6 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Brigitte Tanner
124W–163L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Maria Das Neves
159W–120L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Sylvia Swanson
157W–145L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Pon
115W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.96
Heather Parenti
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keri Cameron
39W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Grewal
12W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michi Tremonte
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Thane Benedict
20W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.