Teams

FTA55A/Kroc/Townsend

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - FTA · 3.5 Women - Tuesday Night

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-21vs FTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Troso)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne McGee / Missy Lawlor vs Dawn Rowley / Susan Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Wolf / Elizabeth Vandiver vs Carol Douglas / Rebecca Sandborg4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Mesa / Angie Hill vs Candice Diggins / Nicole Finch3-6, 3-6
2026-04-07vs FTA55A/Cardinal/HaiglerLost 12
L#1 DoublesMissy Lawlor / Jill Wolf vs Jackie Walker / Sara Mower2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Stewart / Elizabeth Vandiver vs Carrie Drennon / Mary Yates0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAngie Hill / Mara Townsend vs Nancy Lanois / Debbie Etherington6-4, 6-4
2026-03-31vs FTA55A/acac/GitlitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesLyn Boyd / Jill Wolf vs Cindy Gitlitz / Lisa Mlady4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Scoopmire / Angie Hill vs Melissa Richardson / Belva White3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Mesa / Mara Townsend vs Betty Ann Stinchcomb / Donna Parrett3-6, 3-6
2026-03-23vs FTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Troso)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne McGee / Lyn Boyd vs Renee Troso / Dawn Rowley5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGay Dupree / Elizabeth Vandiver vs Candice Diggins / Annette Curin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMara Townsend / Angie Hill vs Kristi King-Brock / Nicole Finch1-6, 3-6
2026-03-10vs FTA55A/Cardinal/NettlesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMissy Lawlor / Jill Wolf vs Tari Dygert / Lorri Laufenberg6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLyn Boyd / Mara Townsend vs Tracey Nettles / Sandi Tolly2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Scoopmire / Kathryn Stewart vs Katherine Robinson / Vicki Dixon6-7, 1-6
2026-03-03vs FTA55A/Cardinal/HaiglerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeg Scoopmire / Suzanne McGee vs Carrie Drennon / Mary Yates1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Wolf / Lyn Boyd vs Catherine Mazza / Sara Mower1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMara Townsend / Angie Hill vs Nancy Lanois / Susan Krzeminski6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-24vs FTA55A/acac/GitlitzWon 21
L#1 DoublesGay Dupree / Suzanne McGee vs Maria Miller / Stephanie Tolbert5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMissy Lawlor / Mara Townsend vs Cathy Crupi / Melissa Richardson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeg Scoopmire / Kathryn Stewart vs Emily Strickland / Donna Parrett6-2, 7-6
2026-02-12vs FTA55A/Cardinal/NettlesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Wolf / Missy Lawlor vs Denise Malone / Katherine Robinson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne McGee / Elizabeth Vandiver vs Valerie Mattingly / Sandi Tolly6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLyn Boyd / Catherine Mesa vs Wendy LaRose / Patricia Coffey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women - Tuesday Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Troso)6217715182
2FTA55A/Cardinal/Haigler6216819181
3FTA55A/acac/Gitlitz35121230237
4FTA55A/Cardinal/Nettles35101430231
5FTA55A/Kroc/Townsend2651940266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Suzanne McGee
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Gay Dupree
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Lyn Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Elizabeth Vandiver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Missy Lawlor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Mara Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Meg Scoopmire
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Catherine Mesa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Mesa + Mara Townsend4450% games+2.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Vandiver + Missy Lawlor1434% gamesnot enough data
Lyn Boyd + Missy Lawlor224 matchesnot enough data
Missy Lawlor + Mara Townsend134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne McGee
16W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gay Dupree
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Lyn Boyd
19W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Vandiver
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Missy Lawlor
12W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.91
Mara Townsend
32W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Meg Scoopmire
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.81
3
Catherine Mesa
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.