Teams

Kramer 55s 3.5W Fri AM

2026 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-01vs Berreth/Herron 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetty Kramer / Kimberly Salata vs Melissa Goodman / Bonnie Satterfield4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Pincus / Debbie Thomas vs Jacqueline Herron / Donna Pearson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Burgess / Christine Osteen vs Krisla Berreth / Patty Craig2-6, 4-6
2026-04-24vs Fogleman 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Pincus / Kimberly Salata vs Mary Batts / Kimberly Franz3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathy Jones / Christine Osteen vs Toni Lewis / Lisa Roach7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-10vs Joseph 55s 3.5W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Jones / Maria Pincus vs Dixie Culver / Suzie Addington6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Salata / Betty Kramer vs Kelly Glick / Paula Gebhard6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristine Osteen / Tammy Pugh vs Beth Loseke / Ingrid Avera6-1, 6-2
2026-04-03vs Womack 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria Pincus / Kathy Jones vs Donna Warrick / Jennifer Dymek6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Osteen / Debbie Burgess vs Judy Thomas / Annie Chapman2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBetty Kramer / Tammy Pugh vs Julia Barnes / Jill Fritz2-6, 4-6
2026-03-27vs Varner/Davis 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Jones / Maria Pincus vs Teresa Cruz / Jamie Stoffel3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnn PORTER / Robin Smith vs Britt Molitoris / DEBORAH WELLS1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBetty Kramer / Tammy Pugh vs Sue Blanchard / Shannon Hughes6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-20vs Degges/Gold 55s 3.5W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Salata / Betty Kramer vs Katharina Welborn / Vickie Degges6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Jones / Maria Pincus vs Dawn Frank / Brenda MacFadden6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Burgess / Christine Osteen vs Beverly Burke / Wanda Davis5-4
2026-03-13vs Rosenthal/Smith 55s 3.5W Fri AMWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Jones / Christine Osteen vs Margaret Reynolds / Linda Chapman6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBetty Kramer / Kimberly Salata vs Kim Tyler / Mechelle Lindenberg6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnn PORTER / Robin Smith vs Betty Smith / Deborah Young6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2026-03-06vs McNeill 55s 3.5W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetty Kramer / Kimberly Salata vs Judy Eaton / Jan Whittaker6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Jones / Christine Osteen vs Anne Thornton / Janis Beshears6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie Thomas / Ann PORTER vs Theresa Atchison / Susan Payne5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kirby 55s 3.5W Wed PM9125512186
2Berreth/Herron 55s 3.5W Fri AM802138140
3Chance 55s 3.5W Wed PM64181231280
4Billings/Wilson 55s 3.5W Wed PM64161436287
5Fogleman 55s 3.5W Fri AM5317718176
6Womack 55s 3.5W Fri AM5315921204
7Joseph 55s 3.5W Fri AM53131125196
8Pressley 55s 3.5W Wed PM55111939285
9Kramer 55s 3.5W Fri AM44131124193
10Varner/Davis 55s 3.5W Fri AM44131124216
11McNeill 55s 3.5W Fri AM44121227232
12Pretzsch 55s 3.5W Wed PM46141638286
13Degges/Gold 55s 3.5W Fri AM1722245280
14Rosenthal/Smith 55s 3.5W Fri AM0822245280
15Redding/White 55s 3.5W Wed PM01062450322

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Christine Osteen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.42
Betty Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.40
Kathy Jones
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Maria Pincus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Kimberly Salata
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Tammy Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Ann PORTER
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Jones + Maria Pincus6161% games+15.9% vs expected
Kathy Jones + Christine Osteen12168% games+11.0% vs expected
Betty Kramer + Kimberly Salata9754% games−3.4% vs expected
Maria Pincus + Kimberly Salata123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Osteen
17W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Betty Kramer
15W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kathy Jones
27W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Maria Pincus
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kimberly Salata
21W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Tammy Pugh
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ann PORTER
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.