Teams

XThreet (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-04vs HShaw (OPRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesRachael Schuler / Lin Su vs Amy Adams / Kristin Davin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Natwick / Jennifer Watson vs Jennifer Gardiner / Lisa Kane6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-27vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Natwick / Jennifer Watson vs Nicole Yudin / Nicole Morris6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana West / Heather Crysler vs Christine Richards / Kerri Good1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Jennifer Alexander vs Stefanie Reynolds / Marianne Keaton6-2, 6-2
2023-09-20vs KMcGregor/MWright (Blakeney)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Lin Su vs Smita Thakur / Michelle Wright6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Watson / Rachael Schuler vs Lee Page / Christina Peterson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sopel / Holly Natwick vs Paula Drake / Julie Jenkins6-2, 6-4
2023-09-18vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Lin Su vs Kerri Good / Debbie Titlestad5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana West / Caroline Pickup vs Monica Erb / Elizabeth Strack6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Natwick / Claudia Vizzini vs Christine Richards / Sharon Roberts6-3, 6-4
2023-09-14vs KMcGregor/MWright (Blakeney)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Diana West vs Michelle Wright / Meghan Bartholomew6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Lin Su vs India Branker / Smita Thakur6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sopel / Wendy Parker vs Katy Hart / Lee Page6-4, 6-1
2023-09-13vs HShaw (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana West / Caroline Pickup vs Jennifer Gardiner / Lisa Kane4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Crysler / Jennifer Sopel vs Heather Shaw / Kristin Davin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Watson / Holly Natwick vs Nan Miller / Barbara Salvucci6-2, 6-4
2023-08-23vs HShaw (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Natwick / Jennifer Watson vs Kristin Davin / Jennifer Gardiner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachael Schuler / Claudia Vizzini vs Janet Steyl / Margaret Schrimsher6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Crysler / Diana West vs Lisa Kane / Barbara Salvucci6-3, 6-4
2023-08-16vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Natwick / Jennifer Watson vs Debbie Titlestad / Elizabeth Strack6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesXersalyn Threet / Anna Hitchins vs Marta Tataje / Mindy Merchant6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana West / Rachael Schuler vs Christine Richards / Marianne Keaton6-1, 6-1
2023-08-09vs KMcGregor/MWright (Blakeney)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHolly Natwick / Jennifer Watson vs Lee Page / Michelle Wright6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesXersalyn Threet / Caroline Pickup vs Julie Jenkins / Paula Drake4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Jennifer Alexander vs Smita Thakur / India Branker6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
Anna Hitchins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Jennifer Sopel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Claudia Vizzini
published 4.5
4.08
Caroline Pickup
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.02
Xersalyn Threet
published
3.77
Rachael Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Holly Natwick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Heather Crysler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Natwick + Rachael Schuler9259% gamesnot enough data
Holly Natwick + Heather Crysler4256% gamesnot enough data
Anna Hitchins + Holly Natwick4166% gamesnot enough data
Holly Natwick + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Sopel + Rachael Schuler213 matchesnot enough data
Anna Hitchins + Heather Crysler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diana West
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Anna Hitchins
96W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Sopel
76W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Claudia Vizzini
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.17
4
Caroline Pickup
245W–112L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
4.08
Xersalyn Threet
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Rachael Schuler
295W–156L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Holly Natwick
85W–44L career · 8 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Heather Crysler
155W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.