Teams

SD 3.5M SDTRC (3:2)/ Faltico

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD - Men - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-02vs SD 3.5M Mtn View (3:2)/ RundeLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Faltico / Stephen Huber vs Tyler Haire / Kevin Dudley1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandall Bolelli / Jeffrey Russell vs Jeffrey Penick / Patrick Mallory6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Faltico / Scott Trulove vs Michael Kamas / Justin Cook3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Stephen Huber vs Petar Racic / PIERRE CHATELAIN1-6, 1-6
2024-04-14vs SD 3.5M SDTRC (3:2) / MonzonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Stephen Huber vs Adam Aronson / Ryan Ogle6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Benjamin Bergen vs Joseph Petrotta / Austin Farres Oriol4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRandall Bolelli / John Wurster vs Todd Bartholomew / Michael McCole6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Russell Austin
published
3.54
Jeffrey Russell
published
3.50
Paul Rybak
published
3.46
Ramiro Muzquiz
published
3.46
Michael Faltico
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Randall Bolelli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Steve Gill
published
3.22
David Amaya
published 3.5
3.21
Benjamin Bergen
published 3.5
3.11
Scott Trulove
published
3.10
John Wurster
published
Kevin Hopkins
published
Matthew Beaghley
published
Stephen Huber
published
William Witt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russell Austin
16W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Jeffrey Russell
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Paul Rybak
19W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Ramiro Muzquiz
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Michael Faltico
46W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Randall Bolelli
45W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Steve Gill
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
David Amaya
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Benjamin Bergen
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Scott Trulove
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
John Wurster
3W–20L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
Kevin Hopkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Beaghley
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Huber
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Witt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.