Teams

Fun Times

2023 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-05-16Won 20
W#2 DoublesLindy McDonald / Kathne Morrell vs Andrea Reynolds / Angie Magnuson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Ewing / Melanie Mitchell vs Amy Boettcher / Glory Questad6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-11vs Shot SistersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelanie Mitchell / Lindy McDonald vs Valerie Roberts / Nancy Baskin4-6, 0-6
2023-05-09vs TennisityLost 01
L#3 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Melinda Neely vs Maria Turner / Kathy Christensen0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKathne Morrell / Lindy McDonald vs Marnie Newton / Barbara Beagles3-6, 4-6
2023-05-02Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAngie O'Hara / Melanie Mitchell vs Suzanna Murali / Becky Caven2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Melinda Neely vs Anya Sandusky / Robyn Roby1-6, 2-6
2023-04-27vs Group Therapy 4.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMelinda Neely vs Rebekah Levy1-6, 3-6
2023-04-25vs Sets AppealLost 12
L#1 SinglesLindy McDonald vs Jeanna Rice2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeann Gilberg / Melinda Neely vs Jenny Grunke / Lisa Hulsman5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLori Ewing / Melanie Mitchell vs Kelli Fredback / Barbara Miller7-6, 7-6
2023-04-18vs Eagle GalsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Lindy McDonald vs Shelley Hunter / Lori van Alfen3-6, 0-6
2023-04-13vs Sporty FortyWon 10
W#3 DoublesLindy McDonald / Melanie Mitchell vs Julie Eisele / Sherry Israel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-11vs Love HurtsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLadawan Johnson / Melinda Neely vs Meredith Howard / Tanya Vaughan5-7, 4-6
2023-04-06vs Sugar & SliceLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindy McDonald / Melanie Mitchell vs Cari Massie / Zel Mertz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngie O'Hara / Melinda Neely vs Deniz Aygen / Lisa della Badia4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alleycats11244821305
2Group Therapy 4.0103401231363
3Love Hurts67252759472
4Sugar & Slice67242862504
5Sporty Forty58223067513
6Penn Ball Wizards310143882547
7Fun Times211163682571

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Krista Perry
published 4
3.65
Angie O'Hara
published 4
3.48
Erin Perry
published 4
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.32
Leann Gilberg
published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.25
Terri Wippel
published 3.5
3.00
2.79
Kathne Morrell
published 3
Ladawan Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lindy McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Maureen Earl
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Melanie Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Melinda Neely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Edwards
published
Renae Rainwater
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Ewing + Krista Perry5449% games+9.6% vs expected
Jennifer Mitchell + Jane Perlaky243647% games+1.6% vs expected
Jane Perlaky + Erin Perry6946% games−0.6% vs expected
Leann Gilberg + Angie O'Hara202944% games−3.5% vs expected
Lori Ewing + Jane Perlaky3647% games−10.5% vs expected
Melanie Mitchell + Lori Ewing203242% gamesnot enough data
Melinda Neely + Jane Perlaky101451% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Mitchell + Terri Wippel101241% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Krista Perry
64W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Angie O'Hara
91W–153L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Erin Perry
68W–102L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Jane Perlaky
146W–185L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Leann Gilberg
126W–186L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Terri Wippel
155W–138L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
3
Kathne Morrell
47W–84L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Ladawan Johnson
44W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindy McDonald
9W–23L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Earl
64W–110L career · 20 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Mitchell
68W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Neely
50W–76L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Edwards
21W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renae Rainwater
19W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.