Teams

Tita Too

2024 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-13vs Lava GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Tamura / Rhonda Zavarro vs Esther Hughes / Shauna Miller6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Daniel vs Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Goff / Ai Chir Magliulo vs Sheri Kinoshita / Karyn Tada0-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs Tita ConnectionWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Daniel / Sheila Tamura vs Teresa Doak / Mari Horike5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Nekoba / Rhonda Zavarro vs Esther Hughes / Judith Jennet7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNina Segawa / Karyn Tada vs Tomoko Fuselier / Ai Chir Magliulo6-2, 6-2
2024-02-25vs Tita ConnectionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLiane Martin / Sheila Tamura vs Teresa Doak / Karyn Tada7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJENNY NISHIDA vs Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLori Nekoba / Merle Yoshino vs Shauna Miller / Nina Segawa3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTomoko Fuselier / Carolyn Goff vs Norine Parish / Donna Shibuya1-6, 0-6
2024-02-11vs Tita ConnectionLost 13
L#1 DoublesLiane Depontes / Nina Segawa vs Liane Martin / Lori Nekoba2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJENNY NISHIDA vs Judith Jennet6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Daniel / Rhonda Zavarro vs Teresa Doak / Mari Horike3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Ai Chir Magliulo vs Lisa Lei Ishikawa / Andrea Ueno6-7, 0-6
2024-01-28vs Tita ConnectionLost 04
L#1 DoublesLiane Martin / Rhonda Zavarro vs Teresa Doak / Sheri Kinoshita4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAi Chir Magliulo vs Judith Jennet1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Daniel / Carolyn Goff vs Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov / Donna Shibuya4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Brotzman / JENNY NISHIDA vs Mari Horike / Lisa Lei Ishikawa1-6, 4-6
2024-01-21vs Tita ConnectionLost 04
L#1 DoublesLiane Martin / Merle Yoshino vs Nina Segawa / Donna Shibuya4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSheila Tamura vs Judith Jennet1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Carolyn Goff vs Mari Horike / Sheri Kinoshita0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Brotzman / Rhonda Zavarro vs Esther Hughes / Karyn Tada4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
JENNY NISHIDA
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Nina Segawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Lori Nekoba
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Sheila Tamura
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.57
Liane Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ai Chir Magliulo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Amy Brotzman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carolyn Goff
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Merle Yoshino
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Frances Calantoc
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Tomoko Fuselier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Zavarro
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merle Yoshino + Frances Calantoc2644% games+0.0% vs expected
Liane Martin + Lori Nekoba3650% games−0.1% vs expected
Frances Calantoc + Tomoko Fuselier5259% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Goff + Amy Brotzman2446% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Zavarro + Sheila Tamura1542% gamesnot enough data
Merle Yoshino + Tomoko Fuselier3256% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Zavarro + Rebecca Daniel044 matchesnot enough data
Frances Calantoc + Amy Brotzman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JENNY NISHIDA
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Nina Segawa
89W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Lori Nekoba
83W–96L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sheila Tamura
33W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
4
Liane Martin
102W–109L career · 6 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ai Chir Magliulo
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amy Brotzman
27W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Goff
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Merle Yoshino
76W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Frances Calantoc
57W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Tomoko Fuselier
59W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Rebecca Daniel
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Zavarro
19W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.