Teams

LA - Team Rancho

2025 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 8.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Erik Marroquin vs Clement Chan / Stacy Goldate4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDeMille Halliburton / Tracy Dickerson vs Darren Finestone / Tammy Finestone6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Sarner / Michael Okwechime vs Kevin Dill / Alexia Monti3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCandice Hung / Erik Marroquin vs Robert Baker / Carrie Kisker5-7, 6-7
L#1 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Erik Marroquin vs Charmaine Felix-Meyer / Jonathan Talbot1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErik Marroquin / Geraldine Brantley vs Jonathan Talbot / Charmaine Felix-Meyer4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Okwechime / Stacy Sarner vs JB Bauersfeld / Sarah Obrien4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesErik Marroquin / Geraldine Brantley vs Robert Baker / Rachel Morris6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 8.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Stacy Sarner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Candice Hung
published 4
DeMille Halliburton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Erik Marroquin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Tracy Dickerson
published
3.61
Jennifer Giordano
published
3.61
Iris Cox
published 4
3.57
Geraldine Brantley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Gerald Blankson
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldine Brantley + Erik Marroquin131450% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stacy Sarner
124W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Candice Hung
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
DeMille Halliburton
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Erik Marroquin
20W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Tracy Dickerson
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Jennifer Giordano
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Iris Cox
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Geraldine Brantley
63W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Gerald Blankson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.