Teams

KTreece/DByrd (Sardis)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-07vs KVaughan (Weddington)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Pollack / Annaliese Anderson vs Nara Gregg / Lisa OBryan6-3, 6-4
2022-09-23vs JSwanson/VWade (Springfield)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnnaliese Anderson / Starr Stroud vs Jillene McGovern / Volree Wade6-2, 6-2
2022-08-26vs BHassell (PCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Johnson / Starr Stroud vs Kelly Algood / Megan Papadakis5-7, 1-6
2022-08-19vs JGraham/TMacuga (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnnaliese Anderson / Donna Pollack vs Jenny Beacham / Molly Brown7-5, 6-4
2022-08-17vs MSevigny/LBurke(Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Pollack / Emily Battle vs Sara Porrata / Ashley Hewitt3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnnaliese Anderson / Starr Stroud vs Maria Sevigny / Suzanne Purdy0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Katie Crosby
published
3.77
3.47
Kendra Treece
published 3.5
3.42
Erin Zelickson
published 3.5
3.39
Emily Battle
published 3.5
3.34
Laura Warden
published 3.5
3.33
Erica Adcock
published 3.5
2.91
Starr Stroud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Diane Byrd
published 2.5
2.43
Donna Pollack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Zelickson + Erica Adcock23367% games+8.9% vs expected
Laura Warden + Starr Stroud5354% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Crosby
69W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Annaliese Anderson
100W–45L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Kendra Treece
62W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Erin Zelickson
82W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Emily Battle
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Laura Warden
47W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Erica Adcock
76W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Starr Stroud
86W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
2.5
Diane Byrd
32W–21L career · no lines in 2022
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Donna Pollack
23W–43L career · 8 lines in 2022
0%71%29%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.