Teams

Team 1 Mojos

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-09vs Team 6Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Hethcox / Dhiraj Jagasia vs John O'Dwyer / Kaj Vetter6-3, 6-3
2022-02-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Berray / Jose Torres vs Steven Alloy / Mike Burgoyne6-2, 6-3
2022-02-17vs Team 5 Z's Last Chance SaloonWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Clark / Reginald Tull vs Jeff Buhl / Aravind Krishna5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDhiraj Jagasia vs W J Peterson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Berray / Shahab Noori vs Jeff Dannick / John Shomaker6-2, 6-4
2022-02-07vs Team 2 The NguyenersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJose Torres / Reginald Tull vs Thuy Nguyen / Doan Chau6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Berray / Shahab Noori vs Anh-Tuan Le / Rob Rivera6-4, 6-4
2022-02-02vs Team 6Won 10
W#1 SinglesDhiraj Jagasia vs John O'Dwyer6-2, 6-0
2022-01-26vs Team 3Won 10
W#2 DoublesJose Torres / Reginald Tull vs Jan Neumann / Jason Wall7-6, 2-2
2022-01-19vs Team 7 Set to WinWon 20
W#1 DoublesReginald Tull / Jose Torres vs Bob White / Dan Winicour6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Berray / Shahab Noori vs Chris Ford / Alan Ogilvie7-6, 6-4
2022-01-12vs Team 5 Z's Last Chance SaloonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDhiraj Jagasia vs Aravind Krishna2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Berray / Jose Torres vs George Gold / W J Peterson6-3, 6-4
2022-01-05vs Team 2 The NguyenersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJose Torres / Reginald Tull vs Doan Chau / Rob Rivera6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Luis Giraldo
published
4.29
Dhiraj Jagasia
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
Chad Wolf
published 4.5
4.25
Reginald Tull
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Kevin Lyle
published
3.88
Thomas Berray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Giraldo
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
5
Dhiraj Jagasia
99W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
4.29
4.5
Chad Wolf
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Reginald Tull
170W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Kevin Lyle
27W–36L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Thomas Berray
80W–91L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.