Teams

Alisal-Colts

2026 SoCal Doubles - Santa Barbara · SB - Men Doubles - 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · SB - Men Doubles - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COAC-LIONS000000
2Elings-String Theory000000
3Alisal-Colts000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Gary Clark
published 4
3.89
Mark Minnoch
published 4
3.84
Walt Seemann
published
3.81
Joe Lazaer
published
3.78
Matthew Hiltner
published
3.78
Sergio Orozco
published
3.70
Gordon Ewing
published 4
3.67
Daniel Thompson
published 4
3.64
Brandon Sedgwick
published 3.5
3.61
Gabriel Alcantara
published 3.5
Jason Reinwald
published
Michael Hicks
published
Wade McBride
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Minnoch + Daniel Thompson6167% games+15.3% vs expected
Gabriel Alcantara + Matthew Hiltner5075% gamesnot enough data
Gary Clark + Sergio Orozco224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Minnoch + Gary Clark213 matchesnot enough data
Jason Reinwald + Matthew Hiltner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gary Clark
36W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Mark Minnoch
54W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
Walt Seemann
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.84
Joe Lazaer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Matthew Hiltner
14W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.78
Sergio Orozco
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Gordon Ewing
15W–21L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Daniel Thompson
80W–50L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Brandon Sedgwick
9W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Gabriel Alcantara
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
Jason Reinwald
12W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Hicks
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wade McBride
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.