Teams

CSU GOLD

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-21vs LVTA SILVERLost 01
L#2 DoublesRyan Seidl / Kurt Fristrup vs Harim Gonzalez / Colby Mueller1-6, 2-6
2024-05-14vs TAG BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesKurt Fristrup / Vikram Patil vs Andrew Hampson / RJ Westlind6-7, 4-6
2024-05-07vs FCCC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesDale Oberlag / Jeffrey Connell vs Shawn Farnell / Michael Gugliotto2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKurt Fristrup / Ryan Seidl vs Brian Krueger / Todd Kooi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-30vs HMTC PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesKurt Fristrup / Craig Stirn vs Kevin Ellis / Todd Rosenzweig3-6, 2-6
2024-04-23vs CSU GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesDale Oberlag / Ryan Seidl vs Colton Dealy / Michael Dirvonas7-5, 6-4
2024-04-16vs LVTA SILVERLost 01
L#2 DoublesDale Oberlag / Elliot Graham vs Colby Mueller / Ian Powers3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Andrew Meister
published 4.5
4.19
Jeffrey Connell
published
4.11
John McNally
published
4.10
Dale Oberlag
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Ryan Seidl
published
3.85
Kurt Fristrup
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Royce Grover
published 4
3.60
Craig Stirn
published 4
Elijah Henley
published
Elliot Graham
published
Roy Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Seidl + Dale Oberlag123 matchesnot enough data
Elijah Henley + Dale Oberlag033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Meister
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.38
Jeffrey Connell
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
John McNally
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
Dale Oberlag
20W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
4.10
Ryan Seidl
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Kurt Fristrup
6W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Royce Grover
18W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Craig Stirn
1W–17L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Elijah Henley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elliot Graham
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roy Foster
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.