Teams

LCTA18/Nipp/MPR

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs LCTA18/Anderson/CTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelsey Doddridge vs Laney Anderson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStella Coulson vs Irina Pevzner6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLauren Cason vs Mellody Burford6-2, 6-0
2026-06-06vs LCTA18/Miller/Dunes WestLost 02
L#1 SinglesChristine Pochily vs Lindsay Moore1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAlice Petzold vs Anita Castles1-6, 0-6
2026-05-30vs LCTA18/Rehder/HamlinWon 21
W#1 SinglesStella Coulson vs Marian Wolff6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSinai Zyblewski vs Shauna Harris6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLauren Cason vs Lori Wisiackas6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-16vs LCTA18/Stribling/MaybankLost 12
W#1 SinglesKelsey Doddridge vs Jade Petersma6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChristine Pochily vs Taylor Cromley2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAlice Petzold vs Ashley Pace1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlice Petzold vs Minhthu Nguyen0-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs LCTA18/Williams/DICLost 03
L#1 SinglesSinai Zyblewski vs Bria Williams2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlex Nipp vs Samantha Sheetz0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHelen Clark vs Lora Dennis3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Williams/DIC5114411121
2LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank5110819153
3LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard Hoffman4214410106
4LCTA18/Miller/Dunes West4213511107
5LCTA18/Nipp/MPR2461225167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Sinai Zyblewski
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Stella Coulson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Catherine Stone
published 3
2.69
Alex Nipp
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.62
Helen Clark
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Kelsey Doddridge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Alice Petzold
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.38
Lauren Cason
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.25
Christine Pochily
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Clark + Lauren Cason044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sinai Zyblewski
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Stella Coulson
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Catherine Stone
2W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Alex Nipp
30W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Helen Clark
18W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
Kelsey Doddridge
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Alice Petzold
31W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Lauren Cason
10W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
3
Christine Pochily
11W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.