Teams

ACP.Rider

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-24vs ACP.PaulLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuyeon Kim / Meghan Rider vs Deno Fonville / Jennifer Kuzma1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-19vs ACP.PaulWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadeline Finley / Emily Childs vs Jennifer Kuzma / Jamie Moy6-3, 6-3
2026-08-15vs ACP.TandradinataLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Emma Holscher / Brenda Li vs Megan Bradley / Amanda Lindsay1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Reynolds / Ragini Singh vs Liz Chen / Shannon Littleton3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEmily Childs / Terry Perrone vs Angela Allen / Aulia Tandradinata6-1, 6-2
2026-08-08vs MCP.RossWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Reynders / Terry Perrone vs Stacy Rank / Sara Velarde3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeghan Rider / Allyson Schneider vs Kristi Laan / Sarah Franks6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMiranda Harmon / Christine Reinke vs Heidi Ross / Lindsay Stanek6-3, 6-1
2026-08-01vs TOC.AllenLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Perrone / Leah Weinberger vs Meghan Kindelan / Kristen Boyce3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Childs / Christine Reinke vs Lindsay Murdock / Valerie Wallace2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Reynolds / Ragini Singh vs Stephanie Hanses / Jennifer Ferralli6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Leah Weinberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Miranda Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Meghan Rider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Mary Emma Holscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Allie Ligay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.57
Emily Childs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Brenda Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Karen Reynders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Christine Reinke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Terry Perrone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Ragini Singh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Allyson Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Naomi Worden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Childs + Meghan Rider2548% games+5.3% vs expected
Karen Reynders + Brenda Li23759% games+0.5% vs expected
Leah Weinberger + Meghan Rider13652% games−3.7% vs expected
Karen Reynders + Meghan Rider7746% games−5.5% vs expected
Terry Perrone + Leah Weinberger5748% gamesnot enough data
Terry Perrone + Meghan Rider7457% gamesnot enough data
Terry Perrone + Karen Reynders224 matchesnot enough data
Terry Perrone + Brenda Li224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leah Weinberger
357W–281L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Miranda Harmon
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Meghan Rider
341W–169L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Mary Emma Holscher
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Allie Ligay
202W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
Emily Childs
31W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Brenda Li
276W–107L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
4
Karen Reynders
238W–141L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Christine Reinke
47W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Terry Perrone
403W–263L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Ragini Singh
94W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Allyson Schneider
291W–172L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Naomi Worden
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.