Teams

SAN JOSE SR 18MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

25 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Ingo Feucht
published 4.5
3.94
David Botkin
published 4
3.85
Garret Seevers
published 4
3.77
Shashi Navar
published
3.74
3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.34
Anthony Hahn
published 3.5
3.33
Lisa Baumert
published
3.25
Dana Glusovich
published 3.5
3.21
Jane Ensor
published
3.21
Dana Knapp
published 3.5
3.20
Amanda Holmquist
published 3.5
3.19
Maxwell Chamberlain
published
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.15
Jeffrey Chamberlain
published
3.10
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
2.82
Michel Schreurs
published
2.68
Eunyoung Feucht
published 3
2.68
Bobby Freeman
published 3
2.65
Amanda Ramos
published 3
2.55
Karen Kim
published
Kathleen Aldridge
published
Larry Lem
published
Murgesh Navar
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Michel Schreurs033 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Ramos + Brett Anthony Foreman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ingo Feucht
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
4.09
4
David Botkin
27W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Garret Seevers
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Shashi Navar
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brett Anthony Foreman
25W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Pauline Teunissen
20W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Anthony Hahn
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
Lisa Baumert
32W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Dana Glusovich
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
Jane Ensor
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Knapp
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amanda Holmquist
1W–17L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Maxwell Chamberlain
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
7W–25L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Jeffrey Chamberlain
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Barbara Westergren
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Michel Schreurs
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Eunyoung Feucht
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Bobby Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Amanda Ramos
10W–27L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Karen Kim
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.55
Kathleen Aldridge
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Larry Lem
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Murgesh Navar
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.