Teams

HRCA YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-12vs CK GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Wilson / Susan Hoelscher vs Megan Abeyta / Kristin Danford6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Caroline Carolan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Eggland / Janet McNutt vs Amber McGregor / Jordan Campbell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Melinda Mueller vs Mandy Paul / Jamie Steese7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-05vs KC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Hoelscher / Adrienne Wilson vs Jayna Hand / Margaret Lamb6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Shannon Kiebler7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Janet McNutt vs Meghan Geisler / Michelle Havard7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy McLemore / Melinda Mueller vs Susan McGarry / Radhika Acharya-Leon4-6, 3-6
2022-06-28vs SSG NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Wilson / Susan Hoelscher vs Kimberly Davis / Leslie Garson-Wright6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Zaitz vs Kristy Marocchi6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Melinda Mueller vs Midi Daddis / Jill Hanafee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShiela Enser / Erin Eggland vs Adriana Buonassisi / Kristen Padberg6-4, 6-4
2022-06-21vs CK GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJanet McNutt / Kippy Christenson vs Amber McGregor / Natasha Vissering Hutter7-6, 1-2
W#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Kristin Danford6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Hoelscher / Adrienne Wilson vs Laura Montoya / Sandra Cranston6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Melinda Mueller vs Jordan Campbell / Mandy Paul2-6, 3-6
2022-06-14vs KC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesErin Eggland / Cindy McLemore vs Margaret Lamb / Shannon Kiebler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Zaitz vs Karin Frenz6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanet McNutt / Kathy Anselmo vs Susan McGarry / Radhika Acharya-Leon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Hoelscher / Judy Esteppe vs Tina Francis / Jayna Hand3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-07vs SSG NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Beverly Tellis vs Leslie Garson-Wright / Kimberly Davis3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Adriana Buonassisi7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErin Eggland / Janet McNutt vs Midi Daddis / Dorothy Ripka6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Wilson / Cindy McLemore vs Kristen Padberg / Kristy Marocchi6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Erin Eggland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.50
Adrienne Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.28
Susan Hoelscher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.26
Stephanie Zaitz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Cindy McLemore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Shiela Enser
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.13
Kathy Anselmo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.11
Beverly Tellis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Janet McNutt
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.05
Mary Ann Hilt
published 4.5
Judy Esteppe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kippy Christenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet McNutt + Kathy Anselmo4163% games+2.9% vs expected
Adrienne Wilson + Susan Hoelscher7160% games+2.1% vs expected
Erin Eggland + Janet McNutt5163% games−0.4% vs expected
Erin Eggland + Mary Ann Hilt8649% games−5.3% vs expected
Erin Eggland + Susan Hoelscher5161% gamesnot enough data
Erin Eggland + Kathy Anselmo3256% gamesnot enough data
Mary Ann Hilt + Beverly Tellis224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy McLemore + Adrienne Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Eggland
58W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.50
4.5
Adrienne Wilson
27W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.50
Susan Hoelscher
64W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
Stephanie Zaitz
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Cindy McLemore
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shiela Enser
22W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Kathy Anselmo
40W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Beverly Tellis
62W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Janet McNutt
86W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Mary Ann Hilt
52W–33L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Judy Esteppe
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kippy Christenson
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.