Teams

RIO DEL ORO CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jenn Bosley
published
3.56
3.51
Sonja Jimenez
published
3.43
Julie Peabody
published
3.41
Christine Sampo
published 3.5
3.40
Corona Meredith
published 3
3.40
Serina Fifield
published
3.38
Julia Agostinelli
published
3.31
Sheena Nash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Molly Huckabay
published
3.21
Lorilei McIntosh
published
3.15
Anne Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Lindsay Ingham
published
3.09
Cindy Kaiser
published 3.5
3.08
Evelyne Jamet
published 3
3.03
3.01
Duffy Kelly
published 3
2.79
Anna Buck
published 3
2.73
Erin Tanner
published 3
2.42
Kari Goodwin
published
Katy Justice
published
Wendy Birmingham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenn Bosley + CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER10460% games+3.6% vs expected
Anne Fisher + Sonja Jimenez123 matchesnot enough data
Kari Goodwin + Evelyne Jamet033 matchesnot enough data
Julia Agostinelli + Lindsay Ingham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenn Bosley
26W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER
35W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Sonja Jimenez
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Julie Peabody
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Christine Sampo
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3
Corona Meredith
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Serina Fifield
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
Julia Agostinelli
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Sheena Nash
8W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Molly Huckabay
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lorilei McIntosh
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
3.5
Anne Fisher
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Lindsay Ingham
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
3.5
Cindy Kaiser
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Evelyne Jamet
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Sylvia Ikeda-Shirinzad
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Duffy Kelly
15W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Anna Buck
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Erin Tanner
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Kari Goodwin
2W–23L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.42
Katy Justice
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Birmingham
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.