Teams

Wimmer/LHCC/Foothills

2023 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 18 & over · 7.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-11vs Dufour/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Greg Diamonti vs Jennifer Dufour / Kenneth Moore1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSara Wimmer / Scott Wimmer vs Taylor Newton / Michael Elmore6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Lovern / Chris Lovern vs Jonathan Lee / Nancy James6-3, 6-2
2023-06-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Lovern / Chris Lovern vs Mark Tumblin / Danielle Tumblin6-4, 6-3
2023-06-22vs Dufour/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Wimmer / Scott Wimmer vs Cori Peters / Scott Peters6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Greg Diamonti vs Kerri Oakley / Adam Oakley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Greg Diamonti vs Greg Padgett / Liza Simpson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Scott Wimmer
published
3.58
Mark Huegerich
published
3.54
Chris Lovern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Lawrence Thompson
published
3.49
Erika Rowland
published
3.43
Sara Wimmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Hank Eimer
published
3.36
Andrea Banks
published 3.5
3.26
Ryan Lovern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Marsha Diamonti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Beth Blair
published 3
2.99
Greg Diamonti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Diamonti + Greg Diamonti9749% games+1.4% vs expected
Ryan Lovern + Chris Lovern9163% gamesnot enough data
Erika Rowland + Lawrence Thompson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Wimmer
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Mark Huegerich
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Chris Lovern
73W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
Lawrence Thompson
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Erika Rowland
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Sara Wimmer
100W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Hank Eimer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Andrea Banks
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Ryan Lovern
79W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Marsha Diamonti
246W–258L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Beth Blair
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Greg Diamonti
33W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.