← Teams

SHC-Sweet

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 2.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Monte Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Mike Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
JAMES KYUNG
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Theresa Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Kerry Sweet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Tracey Beagle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Karla Hendrickson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.34
Carmen Timberlake
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRhonda Baker / Mike Baker vs Judy Friedman / Dave Sasaki6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / James North vs Kimbra Kasch / Lars Kasch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-03Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Monte Gonzales vs Kimbra Kasch / Jeremy Geschwind6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracey Beagle / JAMES KYUNG vs Ilona Vondolovski / Paull Kaady6-2, 6-1
2025-04-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Kerry Sweet vs Ashley Bevan / Bryan Potter6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTheresa Gonzales / Monte Gonzales vs Michelle Boucher / Luis Ponce de Leon6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJAMES KYUNG / Carmen Timberlake vs Kathy Cooke / Paul Ecker6-2, 6-2
2025-04-18Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / James North vs Manoj Pandya / Jane Pinkowski7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBess Jacobo / Kerry Sweet vs Wendy Simons / Dan Pope6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathi Hermanski / JAMES KYUNG vs Craig Tompkins / Janice Hazel6-3, 6-2
2025-04-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Monte Gonzales vs Kusum Mehndiratta / Tom Hsu5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / James North vs Jeane Anastas / Paul Koenigsberg7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBess Jacobo / Kerry Sweet vs Grainne Koeberl / Patrick Koeberl6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRhonda Baker / Mike Baker vs Paul Garrahan / Melanie Morris6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Shahin Ansari vs Scott Soot / Laurel Soot6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / James North vs Jeffrey Bayless / Jani White6-3, 7-5
2025-04-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Kerry Sweet vs James Prouty / Leanne Kong6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracey Beagle / JAMES KYUNG vs June Xiao / George Papasouliotis6-2, 6-2
2025-03-16Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRhonda Baker / Mike Baker vs Mike Olson / Tomoko Langworthy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracey Beagle / JAMES KYUNG vs Wei Pan / Maryann Velez6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTheresa Gonzales / Monte Gonzales vs Ben Yamaguchi / Teresa Darling2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Monte Gonzales
118W–98L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Mike Baker
47W–91L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
JAMES KYUNG
52W–66L career
0%99%1%
2.81
3
Theresa Gonzales
14W–43L career
4%94%2%
2.75
3
Kerry Sweet
31W–63L career
5%95%0%
2.65
3
Tracey Beagle
17W–28L career
13%86%0%
2.64
3
Karla Hendrickson
41W–109L career
18%82%0%
2.56
2.5
Carmen Timberlake
43W–76L career
0%76%24%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.