Teams

Letts/Rogers/SVCC

2025 Adult Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-06vs Dillard/Fayetteville/SRCLost 03
L#1 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Jamia Weir4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDeanna Cicatiello vs Gwendy Lefforge2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJudith Cicatiello vs Sherri Dillard0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-01vs Gilbert/Bentonville/KTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Michelle Gilbert6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBrooke Bricker vs Nancy Ellman6-3, 6-1
2026-01-21vs Bova/Bella Vista/MRCWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeanna Cicatiello vs Jennifer Burleson6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMelanie Neal vs Sherry Fitzgerald6-2, 6-3
2026-01-06vs Bova/Bella Vista/MRCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Kat Bova6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrooke Bricker vs Jennifer Burleson6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMelanie Neal vs Constanza Carrillo6-0, 6-0
2025-12-01vs King/Fayetteville/FACLost 02
L#1 SinglesJudith Cicatiello vs Robin Wise4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKara Briggs vs Susan Murray1-6, 0-6
2025-11-23vs Webb/Bentonville/PCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Suzanne Lankford3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDeanna Cicatiello vs Alison Plager4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Melissa Ocarroll3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Michelle Kehoe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Laurie Letts
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.28
Melanie Neal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.23
Judith Cicatiello
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.20
Brooke Bricker
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Deanna Cicatiello
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Kara Briggs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Neal + Michelle Kehoe5555% games+3.6% vs expected
Deanna Cicatiello + Judith Cicatiello2947% games−1.7% vs expected
Melanie Neal + Laurie Letts3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Kehoe
31W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Laurie Letts
35W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Melanie Neal
31W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Judith Cicatiello
11W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Brooke Bricker
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Deanna Cicatiello
18W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Kara Briggs
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.