Teams

RGAC/Lafferty W4.0S

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Hughes
published 4
3.73
Emily Ullom
published 4
3.58
Sheri Rosenstengle
published
3.55
3.49
SHELLEY ARKELL
published
3.44
Tammie Bean
published
3.43
Tari Kinsey
published
3.42
Fonn Lee
published 3.5
3.38
Janis Battaglia
published
3.38
Amanda Hurst
published 4
3.37
Emily Laurence
published 3.5
Kathie Norris
published
Leslie Oelke
published
Lynda Bennett
published
Monika Piedra
published
Phine Kalonji
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tari Kinsey + SHELLEY ARKELL3347% games+2.7% vs expected
Kathie Norris + Tammie Bean7655% games−8.5% vs expected
Fonn Lee + Sheri Rosenstengle9454% games−9.1% vs expected
Christina Lafferty + SHELLEY ARKELL2636% games−14.5% vs expected
Christina Lafferty + Phine Kalonji4547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Hughes
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Emily Ullom
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Sheri Rosenstengle
32W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Christina Lafferty
23W–46L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
SHELLEY ARKELL
24W–32L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Tammie Bean
19W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tari Kinsey
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Fonn Lee
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Janis Battaglia
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
4
Amanda Hurst
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Emily Laurence
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Kathie Norris
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Oelke
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynda Bennett
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monika Piedra
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Phine Kalonji
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.