Teams

KY/LEX/KaLeLi

2026 USTA COMBO 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 5.5 ADULT WOMEN

20 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 8 6:00 PM
Shillito Park
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Hilary J. Boone Tennis Center at the University of Kentucky
Sep 23 6:00 PM
Sayre Athletic Complex
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Hilary J. Boone Tennis Center at the University of Kentucky
2026-08-30vs KY/Albrecht/Foster/WalkerLost 12
L#1 DoublesShama Hinard / Sidney Boots vs Lee Walker / Qingru Xu2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaddie Herbert / Dezirae Shukla vs Elizabeth Wyndham / Niki Moss3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Landon / Lindsey Burchett vs Jill Niemi / Julia Rhorer6-2, 6-1
2026-08-24vs KY/Albrecht/Foster/WalkerWon 21
W#1 DoublesApril Russell / Elizabeth Yanik vs Charlotte Nickerson / Amanda Fredericks6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Hume / Sidney Boots vs Kristin Harrison / Allyson Foster4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Moreman / Lindsey Burchett vs Jill Niemi / Meghan Whitlow6-1, 6-0
2026-08-21vs KY/Albrecht/Foster/WalkerWon 20
W#1 DoublesMiho Stepka / Dana Hume vs Anna Marino / Elizabeth Wyndham6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaddie Herbert / Jana Hedges vs Jennifer Hoy / Amy Johns1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-14vs KY/Albrecht/Foster/WalkerWon 20
W#1 DoublesApril Russell / Lindsey Quijano vs Beth Thorner / Chenyi Qiu6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana Hume / Elizabeth Yanik vs Kristin Harrison / Julia Rhorer6-2, 6-0
2026-08-03vs KY/Albrecht/Foster/WalkerLost 12
W#1 DoublesApril Russell / Miho Stepka vs Beth Thorner / Anna Marino6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesShama Hinard / Diana Klein vs Amy Johns / Amanda Fredericks2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Landon / Dezirae Shukla vs Allyson Foster / Tina Smith5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 ADULT WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/KaLeLi1133648
2KY/Albrecht/Foster/Walker1133751

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
April Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Sidney Boots
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Dana Hume
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Leah Lykins
published
2.75
Lee Ann Sheehy
published
2.67
Katie Landon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Miho Stepka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Allison Moreman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Monica King
published
2.52
Annie Wallin
published 3
2.47
Shama Hinard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Lindsey Quijano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Maddie Herbert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Lindsey Burchett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Elizabeth Yanik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Diana Klein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Dezirae Shukla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.13
Megan Lyons
published
2.11
Tara Lopez
published
2.07
Jana Hedges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica King + Shama Hinard134 matchesnot enough data
Leah Lykins + Annie Wallin033 matchesnot enough data
Maddie Herbert + Katie Landon033 matchesnot enough data
Monica King + Allison Moreman123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Moreman + Katie Landon123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Yanik + Dezirae Shukla213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Lyons + Tara Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
April Russell
50W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Sidney Boots
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Dana Hume
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Leah Lykins
36W–38L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Lee Ann Sheehy
17W–37L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Katie Landon
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Miho Stepka
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Allison Moreman
21W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Monica King
12W–44L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Annie Wallin
5W–17L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Shama Hinard
11W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Lindsey Quijano
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.42
Maddie Herbert
5W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Lindsey Burchett
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Elizabeth Yanik
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Diana Klein
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Dezirae Shukla
4W–10L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Megan Lyons
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Tara Lopez
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jana Hedges
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.