Teams

NWW-AYTC-Chen

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kerry Spalding
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.51
Wendy Personett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
Results8 ties
2025-03-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Personett / Kerry Spalding vs Willemijn de Clercq / Anne Blackburn6-4, 5-6
2025-03-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Personett / Kerry Spalding vs Melanie Redding / Mary Digenan7-5, 6-1
2025-03-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Personett / Katie Patchin vs Barbara Smith / Nancy Knoll4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Spalding / Wendy Personett vs Renee Waltz / Anne Wilson6-2, 6-0
2025-02-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesKerry Spalding / Wendy Personett vs Pamela Kraus / Jamie Carr6-3, 6-3
2025-01-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Personett / Kerry Spalding vs Angela Taylor / Melissa Kaptik6-4, 6-3
2025-01-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Spalding / Wendy Personett vs Edna Gossage / Shelley Chapman6-1, 6-1
2025-01-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Personett / Kerry Spalding vs Kitty Flaherty / Janice Levesque Bishop6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kerry Spalding
74W–42L career
0%99%1%
3.79
4
Wendy Personett
60W–50L career
31%69%0%
3.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.