Teams

MRC:Kemp

2025 ME Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-08vs Apex:HotDawgs:Diamond-StanicLost 13
W#1 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Andrew Schwepfinger vs Aleks Diamond-Stanic / David Walton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesColby Arau / Bobby Katz vs Robert Disch / Joshua Graceffa2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesIsaac Swain vs Jose Afonso2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKhan Mazhar / John Halpin vs Patrick Casey / David Milliken3-6, 2-6
2025-06-08vs Apex:TheGoodPartners:ChamberlinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMatthew Clark / Isaac Swain vs Matt Chamberlin / Parker Swenson1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Schwepfinger vs Adam Raudonat2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSeth Meyer / Noah Capetta vs Nick Bournakel / Jonathan Sproul6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKhan Mazhar / Bobby Katz vs Samuel Woods / Zachary Disch3-6, 0-6
2025-05-17vs Apex:HotDawgs:Diamond-StanicLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatthew Clark / Isaac Swain vs Aleks Diamond-Stanic / Rudy Jimenez Vela3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Schwepfinger vs Owen Patrick6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTanner Tanter / Truman Cressey vs Robert Disch / Brian Ng3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKhan Mazhar / John Halpin vs Jim Glanville / David Walton3-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Apex:TheGoodPartners:ChamberlinLost 13
W#1 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Andrew Schwepfinger vs Samuel Woods / Parker Swenson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesIsaac Swain vs Adam Raudonat0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTanner Tanter / Truman Cressey vs Thaddeus St John / Charles Graves1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKhan Mazhar / John Halpin vs Boonthai Singcharern / Nick Bournakel2-6, 1-6
2025-04-13vs Apex:TheGoodPartners:ChamberlinLost 04
L#1 DoublesChristopher Kemp / Tanner Tanter vs Matt Chamberlin / Michael Moody3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndrew Schwepfinger vs Adam Raudonat4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChris Walker-Spencer / Bobby Katz vs Ryan Chasse / Samuel Woods2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesColby Arau / Khan Mazhar vs Thaddeus St John / Jonathan Sproul6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-13vs Apex:HotDawgs:Diamond-StanicLost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrew Schwepfinger / Tanner Tanter vs Aleks Diamond-Stanic / Alex Kappelman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Clark / Chris Walker-Spencer vs Steven Mercier / David Milliken6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesColby Arau vs Brian Ng3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBobby Katz / Khan Mazhar vs Rudy Jimenez Vela / Joshua Graceffa5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:TheGoodPartners:Chamberlin51201025241
2Apex:HotDawgs:Diamond-Stanic33171329268
3MRC:Kemp1582247317

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Andrew Schwepfinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
Chris Walker-Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christopher Kemp
published 4.5
3.83
Bobby Katz
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.76
Colby Arau
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Isaac Swain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.67
John McFadden
published
3.59
Truman Cressey
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
John Halpin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Khan Mazhar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Noah Capetta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Seth Meyer
published
Tanner Tanter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Khan Mazhar + John Halpin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Schwepfinger
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Chris Walker-Spencer
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Kemp
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bobby Katz
20W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Colby Arau
31W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Isaac Swain
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
John McFadden
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.67
Truman Cressey
5W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
John Halpin
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Khan Mazhar
2W–15L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noah Capetta
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Seth Meyer
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanner Tanter
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.