Teams

Bartow - D. Pyle

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-06vs CCWH - K. SwainWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy MacDougall / Lindsay Mahler vs Angela Larisey / Sharon Lockwood6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Mahler / Kara Reber vs Marilyn Clyne / Lizbeth Engle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Mahler / Meriel' Peterich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeriel' Peterich / Lindsay Mahler vs Susan McGill / Janet Platania6-1, 6-3
2022-10-25vs CCWH - K. SwainLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Mahler / Rachel Ray vs Sharon Lockwood / Angela Larisey3-6, 3-6
2022-08-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Pyle / Lindsay Mahler vs Rebecca Pate / Mollie Simpson1-6, 0-6
2022-08-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Ramka / Lindsay Mahler vs Julie McBride / Joan Baldava3-6, 4-6
2022-08-16vs Winter Haven - A. BrakefieldLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Mahler / Maria Ramka vs Arabia Brakefield / Daniela Schick6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Annmarie Curle
published 4
3.88
Meriel' Peterich
published
3.88
Amanda Strawbridge
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.62
Lindsay Mahler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
3.54
Jennifer Spann
published
3.15
Deborah Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.12
Maria Ramka
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.11
Dang Williamson
published 3.5
3.00
Karola Cordero
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Pyle + Karola Cordero9655% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Pyle + Maria Ramka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Curle
99W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
Meriel' Peterich
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Amanda Strawbridge
114W–40L career · 22 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
Lindsay Mahler
20W–25L career · 8 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Spann
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Deborah Pyle
65W–55L career · 27 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Maria Ramka
86W–74L career · 22 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dang Williamson
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Karola Cordero
58W–67L career · 19 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.