Teams

15 ACAC Delisio 3.5 Men

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-17vs 6 ACAC CarterWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Delisio / Gregory Cole vs Brian Nalls / Jeffrey Johnson7-5, 6-3
2022-06-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesJohn Delisio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-22vs 3 CCV MurphyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJesse Smith / John Delisio vs Whitson Huffman / Brent Winn6-4, 6-1
2022-05-15vs 18 MTC Resurgence 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJesse Smith / John Delisio vs Alex Balas / Ryan Bardaro4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-01vs 14 Woodlake Patterson 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / Jesse Smith vs Eric Bush / Steve Costantino6-3, 6-4
2022-04-24vs 12 Salisbury BrownWon 10
W#1 SinglesJesse Smith vs Scott White6-4, 6-4
2022-04-18vs 5 Westwood JesseeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / Jesse Smith vs Mark Wickersham / Carter Berry6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-11vs 10 Woodlake McCoyWon 10
W#1 SinglesJohn Delisio vs Peter Schneeberger6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Anthony Forgey
published 4
3.51
Jesse Smith
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.33
Toussaint Manley
published
3.33
Steve Leighty
published
3.31
Ken Hatcher
published
3.23
John Delisio
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Joseph Cipolla
published
2.77
George Drudge
published 3
2.70
Andrew Gillies
published 3
Matt Pepple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Delisio + Jesse Smith151253% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Forgey
33W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Jesse Smith
166W–117L career · 10 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Toussaint Manley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Steve Leighty
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
John Delisio
178W–167L career · 11 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Joseph Cipolla
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3
George Drudge
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrew Gillies
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.70
Matt Pepple
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.