Teams

Duval/Dunn/18&Over8.5M

2024 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Men Summer · 8.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-16vs Baymeadows - VijayWon 10
W#1 DoublesBlake Ward / Paul Vergara vs Jeffrey Henley / Andrew de Jong6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-31vs Eagle Harbor - StricklandWon 10
W#2 DoublesIan Germoglio / Paul Vergara vs Curt Cavins / James Turnbull6-4, 7-5
2024-08-17vs San Jose - Vanden NoortWon 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Kent / Thomas Bobango vs William Morgan / Hans Vanden Noort7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChuck Griffith / Paul Vergara vs Dan Fasbinder / Neal Milligan6-1, 6-1
2024-08-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Kent / Thomas Bobango vs Jason Liddell / Evan Tanner6-3, 6-2
2024-07-27vs Eagle Harbor - StricklandWon 10
W#2 DoublesChuck Griffith / Paul Vergara vs Andrew Rios / Joseph Massaro6-3, 6-0
2024-07-13vs San Jose - Vanden NoortWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Vergara / Thomas Kent vs Miguel Castillo Lopez / Hans Vanden Noort6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Tyler Dunn
published
4.34
Chuck Griffith
published 4.5
4.31
Jonathon Emmet
published
4.29
Vaughn Holland
published
Blake Ward
published 4.5
4.22
Ian Germoglio
published 4.5
4.19
Kris Gouin
published
4.15
Thomas Kent
published
4.05
Zach Waters
published
3.91
Paul Vergara
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Charles Duss
published 4
3.67
Thomas Bobango
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Tim Fritz
published
Kellen Lindsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vaughn Holland + Jonathon Emmet213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Dunn
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Chuck Griffith
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
4.34
Jonathon Emmet
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
Vaughn Holland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Blake Ward
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Ian Germoglio
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
Kris Gouin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
Thomas Kent
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
Zach Waters
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.05
Paul Vergara
96W–71L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Charles Duss
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
Thomas Bobango
28W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Tim Fritz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Kellen Lindsey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.