Teams

F CCV AVERY

2024 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Weekday Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-18vs C TDC-WymanLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Katherine Shiveley vs Nicole Wyman / Lauren Duke7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-07-16vs A Westwood HauseWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Leemore Burke vs Katie Gerecke / Dana Johnson6-2, 7-5
2024-07-11vs H ACAC RuthWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Shiveley / Sarah Dickinson vs Julie Ruth / Leigh Gorman6-2, 6-3
2024-07-02vs D Hermitage LinesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Nancy Taylor vs AMY LINES / Liz Charles1-6, 3-6
2024-06-27vs B Woodlake GlenLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Jennifer Bencks vs Mary Estes / Kimberly Ritter6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-25vs I Burkwood MatthewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Fraizer / Leemore Burke vs Grace Fell / Rochelle Purmasir5-7, 4-6
2024-06-20vs G CCV DeLaceyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Dickinson / Melissa Mauck vs Kim Cressy / Lauren Hepper6-4, 6-3
2024-06-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Page Kral6-4, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Katherine Shiveley
published
4.00
3.96
Nancy Young
published
3.77
Courtney Harper
published 4
3.77
Sarah Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Karen Williamson
published
3.67
Hyde Loupassi
published 4
3.64
Alison Avery
published 4
3.63
Pam Sweeney
published
3.61
Leemore Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Melissa Mauck
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.32
Nancy Taylor
published
Susan Trigg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Mauck + Leemore Burke3350% gamesnot enough data
Alison Avery + Leemore Burke213 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Harper + Karen Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Shiveley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Catherine Benevento
14W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
4.00
Nancy Young
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Courtney Harper
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sarah Dickinson
47W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Hyde Loupassi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Alison Avery
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Pam Sweeney
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Leemore Burke
54W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.61
Melissa Mauck
69W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Nancy Taylor
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.32
Susan Trigg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.