Teams

Cancian (Tamiami Tennis)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesLuisa Alonso / Lorraine Perez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-11-17vs Gary (Continental Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Odon / Alix Surbaran vs Lynne Schettino-DeFelice / Mayra Rosales Sixto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-02vs DeDios (Crandon)Split 11
W#1 DoublesIliana da Corte / Claudia Taboada vs Yvonne Imbert / Adriana Gomez-Roca7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Odon / Alix Surbaran vs Gema de Dios / Margarita Nunez3-6, 5-7
2020-10-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Odon / Iliana da Corte vs Andrea Leon / Maria Paulson4-6, 2-6
2020-10-12vs Burke (Royal Palm)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLuisa Alonso / Claudia Taboada vs Astrid Artho / ISABEL RICO PASTOR6-7, 4-6
2020-10-05vs Gayle (Shulas)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLorraine Perez / Solange Cancian vs Emperatriz Fernandez / Rossana OKAMURA2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Cecilia Pissane
published 4
3.21
Iliana da Corte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Maria Odon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Claudia Taboada
published 3.5
3.13
Ninoska Castrodad
published
3.10
Alix Surbaran
published 3.5
3.00
Lorraine Perez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Luisa Alonso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Solange Cancian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Taboada + Iliana da Corte5650% games−2.8% vs expected
Luisa Alonso + Solange Cancian3446% games−4.2% vs expected
Luisa Alonso + Iliana da Corte2643% gamesnot enough data
Luisa Alonso + Maria Odon0634% gamesnot enough data
Luisa Alonso + Lorraine Perez224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Odon + Iliana da Corte134 matchesnot enough data
Maria Odon + Lorraine Perez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Pissane
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Iliana da Corte
96W–124L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Maria Odon
114W–217L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Claudia Taboada
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Ninoska Castrodad
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Alix Surbaran
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lorraine Perez
17W–61L career · 2 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Luisa Alonso
107W–164L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
2.93
Solange Cancian
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.