Teams

A55 6.0W AVB Pallante

2024 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Summer · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Women Summer

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-16vs A55 6.0W LT1 BurgessWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Pallante / Shirley McMahon vs Sloane Burgess / Doris Tomko6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShannon Tareshawty / Jean Sauerwein vs Jinjun Bao / Elizabeth Meloy2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Neher / Lynne Rosati vs Deb Rutzky / Renee Hansen7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-09vs A55 6.0W TP2 TschantzWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirley McMahon / Judith Pallante vs Sarah Cashman / Susan Moore6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJean Sauerwein / Cathryn Jacobs vs Ann Lynch / Patti Tschantz1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLynne Rosati / Shirley Neher vs Lee Barbetta / Katherine Harris6-2, 6-3
2024-06-25vs OH NEO A55 6.0W FlockenLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudith Pallante / Shirley McMahon vs Lynn Sandstrom / Kim Shepherd4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShirley Neher / Lynne Rosati vs Kathleen Flocken / Jane Stricker2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJean Sauerwein / Dina Hopps vs Mamie Manchester / Janice Kovalcheck2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-18vs A55 6.0W GR DenissoffWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirley McMahon / Judith Pallante vs Lori Trask / Pamela Kelley6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShannon Tareshawty / Chris Muransky vs Lisa Bortz / Pam Miller6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDina Hopps / Jean Sauerwein vs Linda Hultz / Patricia Golkiewicz6-4, 6-0
2024-06-11vs A55 6.0W LT1 BurgessWon 21
L#1 DoublesShannon Tareshawty / Shirley Neher vs Sloane Burgess / Doris Tomko7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShirley McMahon / Judith Pallante vs Renee Hansen / Maureen Banas1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDina Hopps / Jean Sauerwein vs Mary Ann Devine / Julia Euclide6-2, 6-1
2024-06-04vs A55 6.0W TP2 TschantzWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudith Pallante / Shirley McMahon vs Paige Nicholas / Ann Lynch6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShirley Neher / Shannon Tareshawty vs Katherine Harris / Diane Kilivris6-2, 6-1
2024-05-21vs OH NEO A55 6.0W FlockenLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Rosati / Shirley Neher vs Stefanie Currington / Carol Duber3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChris Muransky / Judith Pallante vs Mamie Manchester / Janice Kovalcheck3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDina Hopps / Jean Sauerwein vs Casey Krenn / Monica Lozano6-0, 6-3
2024-05-14vs A55 6.0W GR DenissoffWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudith Pallante / Shirley McMahon vs Cathy Denissoff / Cathy Williams6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShirley Neher / Lynne Rosati vs Deborah Firtha / Patricia Golkiewicz6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCathryn Jacobs / Shannon Tareshawty vs Carol Jackson / Diane Ross6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Women Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Dina Hopps
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
2.97
Judith Pallante
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Chris Muransky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Allison Zwicker
published
Cathryn Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jean Sauerwein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynne Rosati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Shannon Tareshawty
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Shirley McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Shirley Neher
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Viive Clayton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Rosati + Shannon Tareshawty2543% games+5.3% vs expected
Jean Sauerwein + Dina Hopps6359% games+4.0% vs expected
Shannon Tareshawty + Judith Pallante161351% games−0.8% vs expected
Shirley Neher + Shannon Tareshawty4843% games−3.1% vs expected
Shirley Neher + Lynne Rosati131747% games−3.9% vs expected
Shirley McMahon + Judith Pallante10163% gamesnot enough data
Jean Sauerwein + Shirley Neher2535% gamesnot enough data
Allison Zwicker + Judith Pallante4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dina Hopps
153W–106L career · 18 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Judith Pallante
84W–65L career · 8 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
2.5
Chris Muransky
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Allison Zwicker
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Cathryn Jacobs
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jean Sauerwein
14W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynne Rosati
24W–48L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Tareshawty
46W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shirley McMahon
12W–2L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shirley Neher
35W–58L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Viive Clayton
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.