Teams

Alachua - DB/Almond

2021 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-23vs DB - ChaseSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCristi Dobbs / Nancy Embree vs Gwendolyn Crispell / Celia Martin6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Benton / Christa Arnold vs Michelle Ivanowski / Susan Chase6-3, 6-4
2021-05-21vs JTC - Vedam-Mai/PorterSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnna Ligman / Dawn Dean vs Carolyn Shinn / Jayden Lyons6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrista Arnold / Cristi Dobbs vs Vinata Vedam-Mai / Jigisha Shah6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-16vs JTC - Vedam-Mai/PorterWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Ligman / Christa Arnold vs Jigisha Shah / Deborah McCleery7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-07vs DB - ChaseSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDawn Dean / Anna Ligman vs Runi Foster / Cathy Boon6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChrista Arnold / Dorie Frum vs Gwendolyn Crispell / Michelle Ivanowski6-7, 5-7
2021-04-29vs DB - ChaseWon 20
W#1 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Cristi Dobbs vs Tammy Miller / Cathy Boon6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Dean / Dorie Frum vs Celia Martin / Michelle Ivanowski6-0, 6-3
2021-04-25vs JTC - Vedam-Mai/PorterWon 10
W#2 DoublesCristi Dobbs / Nancy Embree vs Jayden Lyons / Jigisha Shah6-0, 6-3
2021-04-15vs DB - ChaseWon 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Embree / Cristi Dobbs vs Cathy Boon / Susan Chase6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChrista Arnold / Dawn Dean vs Julie Ellis / Michelle Ivanowski6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2021-04-08vs JTC - Vedam-Mai/PorterLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Reider / Dawn Dean vs Alison Andrus / Vinata Vedam-Mai6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Dawn Dean
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Nancy Embree
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Cristi Dobbs
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.34
Christa Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Susan Benton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Embree + Dawn Dean6156% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Embree + Cristi Dobbs314 matchesnot enough data
Christa Arnold + Dawn Dean303 matchesnot enough data
Cristi Dobbs + Dawn Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Dean
44W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
Nancy Embree
63W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Cristi Dobbs
60W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Christa Arnold
271W–143L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
Susan Benton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.