Teams

Glen Kernan - Sanyal

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-22vs ABCC - PradoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesErnst Bell / Telis Assimenios vs Todd Lewis / David Dent0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRavi Patel / Miguel Bejar vs James Jordan / Rob McFaul6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRupan Sanyal / Jesse Cancel vs David Lamolinara / Alan Gasparovic6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesDevang Sanghavi / Thien Huynh vs Jeffrey Nelson / Tom Goodrich6-4, 7-5
2025-01-29vs Duval/Daly/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 SinglesRavi Patel vs Michael Wicks3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRupan Sanyal / Miguel Bejar vs Bruce Gillie / John Werba3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCraig Kaye / David Bisson vs Cory Darling / Michael Peters6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJesse Cancel / Ankit Jain vs Scott Mccall / Timothy Carless4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Rupan Sanyal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Ravi Patel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Ernst Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dathendra Pakala
published 3.5
3.24
Telis Assimenios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
David Bisson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
REZA AZARI
published
3.07
Jesse Cancel
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Craig Kaye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Devang Sanghavi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
Miguel Bejar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ernst Bell + Telis Assimenios3254% gamesnot enough data
Craig Kaye + David Bisson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rupan Sanyal
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Ravi Patel
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Ernst Bell
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Dathendra Pakala
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Telis Assimenios
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
David Bisson
3W–12L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
REZA AZARI
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jesse Cancel
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Craig Kaye
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Devang Sanghavi
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Miguel Bejar
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.