Teams

LTFCS OSTLY

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - SOCO · MIXED 6.5 - ITA - SOCO

14 players · average NTRP 3.05 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-21vs CSCC SPANTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Tompkins / Erin Reed vs Keith Oppenheim / Cynthia Davis6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs Amadee Pepper / Kristi McCann6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDenny Elston / Chad Houchin vs Greg Wilborn / Diane Wilborn6-1, 6-3
2022-08-14vs CSCC SPANTONWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs Carre Bistline / Thomas Shea6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCederick Dark / Lisa Ostly vs Grayson Graham / Sutton Spanton7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Goldstein / Denny Elston vs Amadee Pepper / Cynthia Davis6-4, 6-1
2022-08-07vs CSCC SPANTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesChad Houchin / Jane Roberts vs Grayson Graham / Sutton Spanton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs John Swarmer / Kristi McCann6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrederick Thurman / Camille Ku vs Amadee Pepper / Carol Pepper6-0, 6-1
2022-08-05vs CSCC SPANTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Roberts / Cederick Dark vs Carre Bistline / Bobby Wilford7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTressa Bishop / Chad Houchin vs Larry Liston / Kristi McCann6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Ostly / Frederick Thurman vs Keith Oppenheim / Carol Pepper6-0, 6-1
2022-07-24vs CSCC SPANTONWon 21
W#1 DoublesCederick Dark / Camille Ku vs John Swarmer / Diane Wilborn6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTodd Goldstein / Lisa Ostly vs Sutton Spanton / Grayson Graham2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBill Graziano / Tressa Bishop vs Amadee Pepper / Carol Pepper6-1, 7-5
2022-07-17vs CSCC SPANTONWon 20
W#1 DoublesTodd Goldstein / Erin Reed vs Grayson Graham / Carre Bistline4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrederick Thurman / Denny Elston vs Amadee Pepper / Carol Pepper6-3, 6-0
2022-07-10vs CSCC SPANTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesCederick Dark / Camille Ku vs Grayson Graham / Sutton Spanton6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Tompkins / Erin Reed vs Bobby Wilford / Cynthia Davis6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBill Graziano / Jane Roberts vs Keith Oppenheim / Kristi McCann6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.5 - ITA - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Andy Field
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Camille Ku
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Cederick Dark
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
John Tompkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Erin Reed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Jessica Field
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Frederick Thurman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Lisa Ostly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Chad Houchin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Todd Goldstein
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Bill Graziano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Denny Elston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jane Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tressa Bishop
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Field + Andy Field24961% games+11.1% vs expected
Todd Goldstein + Denny Elston9267% games+8.6% vs expected
John Tompkins + Erin Reed8166% games−0.4% vs expected
Cederick Dark + Erin Reed4549% games−7.4% vs expected
Jane Roberts + Bill Graziano6549% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Ostly + Frederick Thurman4251% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Ostly + Chad Houchin4159% gamesnot enough data
Erin Reed + Frederick Thurman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Field
120W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Camille Ku
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cederick Dark
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
John Tompkins
45W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Erin Reed
64W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jessica Field
134W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Frederick Thurman
38W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Lisa Ostly
123W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Chad Houchin
58W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Todd Goldstein
62W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Bill Graziano
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Denny Elston
49W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.28
Jane Roberts
26W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tressa Bishop
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.