Teams

Maitland-Cooper

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER-Day · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesErica Bates / Sarah Tomlinson vs Emma Starling / Debbie Ason3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShelby Taussig vs Hilary Miller6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAshley Cooper / Amy Favero vs Jennifer Wodi / Amy Jackson6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCarrie Dalton vs Kadriye Hasoglu6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Grindstaff / Stephanie McDowell vs Louise Morsi / Shelley Sprague6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Kate Boone
published
3.16
Tiffany Freeland
published
3.12
Molly Harris
published
3.08
Shelby Taussig
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.03
Courtney Maloney
published 3
3.02
Amy Zimmer
published 3
2.96
Ashley Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Carrie Dalton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Sarah Tomlinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Mindy Laverghetta
published
2.79
Amy Favero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Erica Bates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ashleigh Torres
published 3
2.75
Jennifer McGaffic
published
2.72
Andi Kroll
published 3
Sommer Male
published
Stephanie McDowell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Grindstaff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Favero + Courtney Maloney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Boone
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.24
Tiffany Freeland
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.16
Molly Harris
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Shelby Taussig
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Courtney Maloney
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Amy Zimmer
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Ashley Cooper
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Carrie Dalton
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Sarah Tomlinson
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Mindy Laverghetta
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Amy Favero
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Erica Bates
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ashleigh Torres
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer McGaffic
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Andi Kroll
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Sommer Male
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie McDowell
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Grindstaff
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.