Teams

KY/LOU/MCCOY

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25Won 21
L#1 SinglesDarnell McCoy vs Kevin Conley0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBen Hinds vs Ethan Sanders4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBrandon Cissell vs David Wagner6-4, 6-4
2026-08-17vs KY/LOU/BURNETTLost 12
L#1 SinglesDarnell McCoy vs Abraham O'Coffey4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKrzysztof Wolek vs Jason Rice1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs Cruz Mario Aguero4-6, 3-6
2026-08-04Won 21
L#1 SinglesBen Hinds vs Kevin Conley0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKrzysztof Wolek vs Ethan Sanders7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs David Wagner6-3, 6-4
2026-07-27Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDarnell McCoy vs Thomas Jones4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesBen Hinds vs Abraham O'Coffey4-6, 3-6
2026-07-15Won 21
W#1 SinglesDavid Conway vs Kevin Conley6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesBrandon Cissell vs Zachary Allen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesTopaz Prawito vs Clay Watkins7-5, 6-2
2026-07-07vs KY/LOU/BURNETTLost 03
L#1 SinglesSeth Gannon vs Alex Kepnes5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesBrandon Cissell vs Abraham O'Coffey4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Vickers vs Cruz Mario Aguero4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/BURNETT31849100
2KY/LOU/MCCOY236919153
3KY/LOU/WAGNER12451289

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Topaz Prawito
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.74
David Conway
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Seth Gannon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.67
Darnell McCoy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Brandon Cissell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Ben Hinds
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.52
Krzysztof Wolek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Michael Vickers
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darnell McCoy + Ben Hinds5069% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Topaz Prawito
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
4
David Conway
3W–4L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Seth Gannon
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Darnell McCoy
28W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Brandon Cissell
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Ben Hinds
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Krzysztof Wolek
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Michael Vickers
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.