Teams

JLee (Colonel Beatty)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-20vs KConrad/RLynn (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKris Jones / Teresa Riley vs Marianne Blum / Nicole Morgan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFelicia Ahn / Seung Hee Noh vs Sarah Nitsche / Kelley Conrad6-4, 6-3
2023-09-13vs JJohnson/MDwyer (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHillary Kroboth / Teresa Riley vs Sandy Dellinger / Tricia Magee4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Kroboth / Teresa Riley vs Tami Hood / Anita Stewart-Stover2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-06vs MOlsen (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHillary Kroboth / Teresa Riley vs Jennifer Robinette / Melissa Leisure1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKris Jones / Seung Hee Noh vs Deepti Dua / Michele Olsen2-6, 1-6
2023-08-23vs DCombis (River Hills Country Club)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTeresa Riley / Kris Jones vs Ali Sacopulos / Lisa Wright2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElisa Salim / Seung Hee Noh vs Stephanie McKay / Julie Carlsen7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-16vs MKelling/RJoplin (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Lee / Seung Hee Noh vs Bridget Happney / Karissa Chaplinsky2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKris Jones / Teresa Riley vs Renay Joplin / Lindsay Smith1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Elisa Salim
published 4
3.44
Felicia Ahn
published 3.5
3.38
Hillary Kroboth
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Kris Jones
published
2.96
Teresa Riley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Seung Hee Noh
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Jane Lee
published
Sun Moon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisa Salim + Felicia Ahn5170% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Riley + Hillary Kroboth044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Salim
71W–27L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Felicia Ahn
89W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Hillary Kroboth
87W–52L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kris Jones
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3
Teresa Riley
70W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Seung Hee Noh
38W–34L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Jane Lee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sun Moon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.