Teams

Love-Love Ladies

2026 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-19vs Chicks with SticksLost 12
L#1 DoublesTanya Zutshi / Caroline Seaberg vs Zhimin Huo / Cynthia Medley-Evanetski4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Gossin / Anna Spin vs Grace Miller / Teresa Metcalfe3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllison O'Malley / Heather Bartlett vs Theresa Croce / Kathleen Wilmot6-1, 1-2
2026-04-12vs Sweet SpotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaitlynn Arias / Caroline Seaberg vs Blaire Davis / Lydia Varon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Robinson / Elizabeth Thurnherr vs Sharon Napier / Mary-Beth Rumble5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYan Sun / Shelby George vs Nicole Sayers / Susan Reynolds2-6, 4-6
2026-03-28vs ROC: Net BreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaitlynn Arias / Tanya Zutshi vs Deborah McKnight / Kristen Zablonski4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Robinson / Jing Zhang vs Carol Eisenman / Judy Allen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelby George / Liping Jia vs Yulia Nedelko / Michelle Menon Miyake1-6, 1-6
2026-03-22vs MidtownLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaitlynn Arias / Tanya Zutshi vs Alina Santiago / Grace Kurzweil7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSandra Chu / Cheryl Gossin vs Kim Bender / Joanne Parkes1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLiping Jia / Allison O'Malley vs Amanda Coffey / Carolina Gonzalez5-7, 1-6
2026-03-07vs Chicks with SticksLost 03
L#1 DoublesTanya Zutshi / Caroline Seaberg vs Zhimin Huo / Cynthia Medley-Evanetski2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJing Zhang / Jennifer Baker vs Kristi Seaver / Teresa Metcalfe3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJun Ma / Shelby George vs Grace Miller / Sara Kelch2-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs Sweet SpotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaitlynn Arias / Anna Spin vs Marcia Brayer / Blaire Davis2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Thurnherr / Melanie Robinson vs Mary-Beth Rumble / Fauna Pappalardo-Minges4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJun Ma / Yan Sun vs Nicole Sayers / Lynne Shoars3-6, 2-6
2026-02-22vs ROC: Net BreakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaitlynn Arias / Caroline Seaberg vs MAGGIE REILLY / Deborah McKnight6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Thurnherr / Jennifer Baker vs Kathleen Spellane / Kathleen Savage4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Bartlett / Allison O'Malley vs Yulia Nedelko / Michelle Menon Miyake2-6, 3-6
2026-02-13vs MidtownLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaitlynn Arias / Tanya Zutshi vs Carly Krystyniak / Alina Santiago6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJing Zhang / Sandra Chu vs Elizabeth Johnson / Joanne Parkes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShelby George / Liping Jia vs Amanda Spencer / Elizabeth Sharpe7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kaitlynn Arias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Tanya Zutshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Caroline Seaberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Elizabeth Thurnherr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jun Ma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Sandra Chu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Melanie Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jing Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Anna Spin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Cheryl Gossin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Yan Sun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Liping Jia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Heather Bartlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Shelby George
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Allison O'Malley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaitlynn Arias + Tanya Zutshi3254% games+4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Baker + Jing Zhang224 matchesnot enough data
Jing Zhang + Liping Jia134 matchesnot enough data
Shelby George + Liping Jia033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlynn Arias
61W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Tanya Zutshi
94W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Caroline Seaberg
29W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Elizabeth Thurnherr
110W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Jun Ma
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.31
Sandra Chu
0W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Melanie Robinson
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Jing Zhang
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anna Spin
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cheryl Gossin
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Baker
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Yan Sun
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Liping Jia
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Heather Bartlett
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Shelby George
3W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Allison O'Malley
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.