Teams

Berning/Knoxville

2026 Mixed 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Mixed 18&over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs Ambrose/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Burfeind / Imke Burfeind vs Ankur Patel / Georgia Rae Rainer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Mcclenagan / RD McClenagan vs Daniel Moon / Isha Patel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Parks / Madeline Digges vs Alex Rush / Madison Coleman4-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs 18Hoschette/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandon Parks / Lake Bailey vs Tyler Govert / Kimberly Nelson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesZachary Berning / Natalie Berning vs Jake Abernathy / Jill Hoschette6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Ewing / Madeline Digges vs William Brown / Heather Wilson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-12vs Open/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharles Ewing / Elsa Roland vs Shawn Mason / John Mason3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Berning / Natalie Berning vs Brandon Stevens / Amy Belew6-3, 6-2
2026-07-06vs Ambrose/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Ewing / Elsa Roland vs Ankur Patel / Paola Martinez0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLake Bailey / Brandon Parks vs Alex Rush / Pearl Jhala0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesZachary Berning / Natalie Berning vs Isha Patel / Walker Moncier2-6, 4-6
2026-06-28vs 18Hoschette/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesRD McClenagan / Emily Mcclenagan vs Hunter Arritt / Jill Hoschette5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Burfeind / Imke Burfeind vs Tyler Govert / Kimberly Nelson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMadeline Digges / Justin Stimets vs William Brown / Heather Wilson1-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs Open/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Ewing / Elsa Roland vs Sarah Olesiuk / Nathaniel Evans6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed 18&over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
118Hoschette/Knoxville4210818152
2Berning/Knoxville1441125162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
RD McClenagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Emily Mcclenagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Kevin Keck
published
3.36
Lake Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Justin Stimets
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Brandon Parks
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.03
Zachary Berning
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Imke Burfeind
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Benjamin Burfeind
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Elsa Roland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Madeline Digges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Berning
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zachary Berning + Natalie Berning4160% gamesnot enough data
Imke Burfeind + Benjamin Burfeind314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

RD McClenagan
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Emily Mcclenagan
42W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Kevin Keck
37W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Lake Bailey
45W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.36
Justin Stimets
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Brandon Parks
19W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Zachary Berning
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Imke Burfeind
27W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Benjamin Burfeind
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Elsa Roland
47W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Madeline Digges
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Natalie Berning
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.