Teams

SGV ATCC - Stahl-Nix - ATCC

2021 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlma Banuelos / Darlene Parada vs May Nakamura / Stacy Hanway2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesValiere Byrnes / Shelley McMahon vs Kelly Moss / Satsuki Yamashita0-6, 1-6
2021-05-02vs SGV Team Snorlax - Manley- WNWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlma Banuelos / Darlene Parada vs Bu Kum Kim / Julia Lin6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2021-04-10vs SGV Chow Fun - Chow - WNLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristyne Burdett / Valiere Byrnes vs Mala Lee / Britta Hurst3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlma Banuelos / Valiere Byrnes vs Lorna Kim / Wei Zhang1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
3.69
Rebecca Stokes
published
3.29
Melinda Stahl Nix
published
3.27
Alma Banuelos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Valiere Byrnes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Pamela Rosenberg
published
Shelley McMahon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alma Banuelos + Melinda Stahl Nix224 matchesnot enough data
Valiere Byrnes + Alma Banuelos033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christyne Burdett
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
Rebecca Stokes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Melinda Stahl Nix
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Alma Banuelos
28W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Valiere Byrnes
24W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Pamela Rosenberg
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Shelley McMahon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.