Teams

HARBOR PT 40AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Dana Marotto
published 4.5
Bec Heinrich
published 4.5
4.19
Valeria Pinna
published
4.10
Annika Viragh
published 4.5
4.05
Marie van Elder
published
3.91
Heather Ham
published
3.82
Daru Kawalkowski
published 4
3.73
Lynn Graham
published
3.71
Adrienne Murphy
published 4
3.66
Freda O'Brien
published
3.58
Martha Pearl
published
3.57
Mary Carse
published
3.55
Debra Andelin
published 4
3.14
Vesa Becam
published
Jennifer Nichols
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Marotto
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Bec Heinrich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Pinna
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Annika Viragh
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Marie van Elder
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Heather Ham
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Daru Kawalkowski
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Lynn Graham
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Adrienne Murphy
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Freda O'Brien
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Martha Pearl
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Mary Carse
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
4
Debra Andelin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Vesa Becam
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Nichols
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.