Teams

SRTC Mullins

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Weekend · Fall 3.0 Men Dayton

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-01-11vs WPAFB CoyLost 12
W#1 DoublesCecil Mullins / David Kenline vs Michael Silva / Jon Farley6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesGeorge Xiao vs Tae Kim2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBob Bowman / Gene Haas vs Shawn Mcneil / Brian Tran3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-05vs KTC HostetterWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Bowman / Gene Haas vs James Dunlap / Daniel Dull2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGeorge Xiao vs Andy Bremer6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCecil Mullins vs David Swanson6-3, 6-3
2024-11-23vs STC StewartLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Kissel / Bob Bowman vs Joseph Rothstein / Rob Hagelberg2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGeorge Xiao vs Jacob Mozer7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGene Haas / Richard Hallbeck vs Kane Feltner / Brian Stanford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-17vs QRRC KeatonWon 21
W#1 DoublesGene Haas / Richard Hallbeck vs Ryan Babienco / Phillip Hotz6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGeorge Xiao vs Zach Raney6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBob Bowman / Cecil Mullins vs Robert Kastler / David LeBlanc6-7, 2-6
2024-11-09vs FSSC ArmitageLost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorge Xiao / Gene Haas vs Bill Pierson / Eric Lute4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCecil Mullins vs Zachary Sanford4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Kenline / Richard Hallbeck vs Rahul Nair / Randy Ray1-6, 5-7
2024-10-26vs WPAFB CoyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Kenline / Bob Bowman vs Aaron Schares / Rick Holbrook2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGeorge Xiao vs Michael Silva6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCecil Mullins vs Brian Tran6-2, 6-3
2024-10-20vs KTC HostetterLost 03
L#1 DoublesBob Bowman / Todd Kissel vs Russell Hardie / Eric McHenry2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGene Haas vs Bosung Kang0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Xiao / Richard Hallbeck vs Daniel Dull / Ramzi Nahhas5-7, 5-5
2024-10-12vs QRRC WolfeLost 13
W#1 DoublesGeorge Xiao / Todd Kissel vs Michael Dadaian / JONATHAN FULTON7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCecil Mullins vs Isaac Bokros2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGene Haas / Richard Hallbeck vs Daniel Henderson / Thomas Tisler0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Kenline / Bob Bowman vs Ken Kaylor / Richard Guinto3-6, 4-6
2024-10-06vs STC StewartLost 12
W#1 DoublesCecil Mullins / George Xiao vs Tom Cecil / Kane Feltner1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTodd Kissel vs Brandon Workman5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBob Bowman / David Kenline vs Drew Hackenberger / Steven Iddings7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-22vs FSSC ArmitageSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGene Haas / Cecil Mullins vs Eric Lute / Rahul Nair7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTodd Kissel vs Zachary Sanford7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBob Bowman / Jacob Dotson vs Alan Armitage / Bill Pierson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGeorge Xiao vs Eric Lowman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 3.0 Men Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
George Xiao
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.05
Todd Kissel
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Cecil Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
David Kenline
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Bob Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
Gene Haas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Jacob Dotson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Hallbeck
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Kenline + Bob Bowman1443% games−6.2% vs expected
Cecil Mullins + Todd Kissel4156% gamesnot enough data
Cecil Mullins + George Xiao2351% gamesnot enough data
David Kenline + Gene Haas134 matchesnot enough data
Cecil Mullins + David Kenline213 matchesnot enough data
Cecil Mullins + Bob Bowman123 matchesnot enough data
Gene Haas + Richard Hallbeck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Xiao
36W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Todd Kissel
62W–33L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Cecil Mullins
69W–86L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
David Kenline
10W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Bob Bowman
7W–34L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gene Haas
3W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Dotson
3W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Richard Hallbeck
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.