Teams

Speirs

2021 Montgomery Combo Fall · Combo Women 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-11vs RubinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarrie Baumann / Kristina Leary vs Nancy Cooper / Heather Sine3-6, 1-6
2021-12-04vs MaciaWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Dean / Cora Ho vs Elizabeth Taylor / Simone Feldman7-5, 6-2
2021-11-30vs The MojitosWon 20
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Chan / Kristina Leary vs Alison Serino / Cecilia Jones7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCora Ho / Kerry Spicer vs Polyxena Speros / Mary Ellen Staggers7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2021-11-18vs Tennis AnglersWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Dean / Cora Ho vs Riette van Laack / Shalen Fairbanks6-1, 6-0
2021-11-02vs MaciaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKristina Leary / Stephanie Richards vs Nicole Ifill / Simone Feldman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCora Ho / Laura McInerney vs Liz Price / Kimberly Mielcarek6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-28vs RubinoWon 20
W#2 DoublesCora Ho / Judy Pretka vs Kim Hazel / Tria Thalman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarrie Baumann / Kristina Leary vs Grace Becton / Margaret Rubino6-3, 6-4
2021-10-24vs The MojitosLost 01
L#3 DoublesCora Ho / Kerry Spicer vs Katya White / Melissa Hayes-Gehrke3-6, 3-6
2021-10-06vs Wonder WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Brammer / Cora Ho vs Jayne Korolkoff / Michele Keegan6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Michele Brammer
published
4.12
Pamela Dean
published
3.90
Evelyn Chan
published 4
3.60
Kristina Leary
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Laura McInerney
published
3.36
Kerry Spicer
published
3.28
Cora Ho
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Sarah Speirs
published
3.15
Angela Lee
published 3.5
Jessica Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Leary + Pamela Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
Pamela Dean
40W–40L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Kristina Leary
272W–166L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Laura McInerney
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kerry Spicer
3W–10L career · no lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
Sarah Speirs
33W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Angela Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.