Teams

RBrown (Park Crossing)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-29vs KLull (Bridgehampton)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnastasia Speer / Jocelyn Zuehlke vs Jessica Abrams / Tina Rogovin6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-15Split 11
W#2 DoublesMemory Ayers / Jocelyn Zuehlke vs Katherine Hohnbaum / Sheryl Bucci6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCherie Bouchon / Tish Macuga vs Kendra Neigoot / Melissa Murphy4-6, 4-6
2023-09-08vs CMcKiernan/MDorst (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnastasia Speer / Tish Macuga vs Niki Koesel / Suzanne Austin6-3, 6-3
2023-09-01vs PGatewood (Charlotte CC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Woerner / Jocelyn Zuehlke vs Rachel Lee / Amy Schaaf3-6, 3-6
2023-08-25vs TMiller (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Brown / Tish Macuga vs Elizabeth Frederick / Jessica Salzman6-0, 6-0
2023-08-18vs KCox (MPCC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTatiana Thomas / Tish Macuga vs Haley Timperio / Ann Patterson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAllison Woerner / Jocelyn Zuehlke vs Torey Parsons / Melissa Sullivan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Susan McGinn
published
3.22
Memory Ayers
published
3.14
Cherie Bouchon
published 3.5
2.97
Suzanne Hair
published
2.90
Allison Woerner
published 3
2.89
Jaime Graham
published 3
2.84
Tish Macuga
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Tatiana Thomas
published
2.74
Jocelyn Zuehlke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Jenny Beacham
published
Anastasia Speer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tish Macuga + Jocelyn Zuehlke3746% games+0.8% vs expected
Tatiana Thomas + Tish Macuga4157% gamesnot enough data
Jocelyn Zuehlke + Cherie Bouchon134 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Beacham + Tish Macuga123 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Graham + Memory Ayers123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Woerner + Cherie Bouchon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan McGinn
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Memory Ayers
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cherie Bouchon
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Suzanne Hair
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Allison Woerner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Jaime Graham
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Tish Macuga
74W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
Tatiana Thomas
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Jocelyn Zuehlke
63W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Jenny Beacham
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Anastasia Speer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.