Teams

Sac Sac

2023 Montgomery Tri-Level Mixed 18 & Over · Montgomery Tri-Level Mixed 8.0, 7.0, 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.65 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-18vs Left SacLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohnny Hsiung / Jessica Lee vs Afshin Vettovaglia / Heather Sine5-7, 4-6
2023-12-15vs Left SacWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Johnny Hsiung vs Sarah Speirs / Brian Lynk6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-12-07vs Left SacWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristina Leary / Denis Vashuk vs Cora Ho / Afshin Vettovaglia6-4, 6-2
2023-11-28vs Left SacSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnto Faini / John Lee vs Hsuan Ou / Kara Stegeman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJames Albert / Shari Albert vs Diana Talesnick / Victor Sanchez4-6, 1-6
2023-11-14vs Left SacSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristina Leary / Johnny Hsiung vs Afshin Vettovaglia / Cora Ho3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnto Faini / John Lee vs Hsuan Ou / Sarah Speirs0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-10-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCorinne Hart / Phillip Harvin vs Hsuan Ou / Sarah Speirs2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Tri-Level Mixed 8.0, 7.0, 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Johnny Hsiung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Evelyn Chan
published 4
3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.65
Anto Faini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.60
Kristina Leary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.38
Corinne Hart
published 3.5
3.34
Sheila O'Connell
published
3.20
James Albert
published 3.5
3.15
Phillip Harvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.68
Shari Albert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jessica Lee
published
John Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Leary + Johnny Hsiung15562% games+4.9% vs expected
Evelyn Chan + Johnny Hsiung3448% games−5.9% vs expected
Shari Albert + James Albert1637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Johnny Hsiung
573W–156L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
Lucy Wang
33W–16L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.85
4
Christopher Grant
27W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Anto Faini
227W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.65
4
Kristina Leary
272W–166L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Corinne Hart
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
Sheila O'Connell
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
James Albert
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Phillip Harvin
144W–211L career · 1 line in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Shari Albert
101W–181L career · 1 line in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Lee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.