Teams

IE-TCC-Yarter

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - IE · IE Mixed 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-06vs IE-LLW-Elevenis-BolandWon 10
W#3 DoublesEllen Yarter / Lionel Yang vs Susan Campbell-Boland / Spencer Nguyen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-23vs IE-CCCC-HamlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Yarter / Ellen Yarter vs Shayne Harper / Justin Harper2-6, 3-6
2025-07-19vs IE-LLW-Elevenis-BolandLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Yarter / Lionel Yang vs Tai Sisson / Mike Chen4-6, 4-6
2025-07-05vs IE-LLW-Elevenis-BolandWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Yarter / Lionel Yang vs Heidi Schuler / Charles Chaya2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-31vs IE-CCCC-HamlinLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Yarter / Ellen Yarter vs Ian Wheeldon / Elizabeth Knoblach3-6, 2-6
2025-05-24vs IE-LLW-Elevenis-BolandWon 10
W#2 DoublesLionel Yang / Ellen Yarter vs Matthew Boland / Risa Chung6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Ryan Foran
published
4.01
Lionel Yang
published
3.92
James Fidak
published
3.92
Chad Brantley
published 4
3.84
Richard Eddy
published
3.82
Silvia Vich
published
3.79
Amar Raheja
published 4
3.76
Michele Ivey
published
3.76
Anhtu Pham
published 4
3.71
Mark Yarter
published
3.67
Kendall Bronk
published
3.48
Geneva Roe
published
3.25
Ellen Yarter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Brantley + Anhtu Pham3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Foran
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Lionel Yang
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
James Fidak
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Chad Brantley
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Richard Eddy
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Silvia Vich
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amar Raheja
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Michele Ivey
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Anhtu Pham
10W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Mark Yarter
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kendall Bronk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Geneva Roe
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.