Teams

FF:GutGame:Dwyer

2025 ME Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 9.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.31 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-02vs Apex:KapothanasisWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Dwyer / Alejandro P Andres vs Anastasia Kapothanasis / Steven Mercier6-2, 6-0
2025-02-02vs Apex:KapothanasisWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Dwyer / Alejandro P Andres vs Anastasia Kapothanasis / Brian Ng6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Alejandro P Andres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.42
Aleks Diamond-Stanic
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.38
Andrew Schwepfinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Julia Goldman
published
4.25
Rudy Jimenez Vela
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Christopher Kemp
published 4.5
4.16
Leah Sommer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.98
Gomes Afonso Paulo
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.94
Donna Dwyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Michael Emmert
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.86
Deanna Mao
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Eve Harrison
published 4
Karolina Pierko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aleks Diamond-Stanic + Leah Sommer19464% games+6.5% vs expected
Deanna Mao + Michael Emmert7356% games+0.8% vs expected
Karolina Pierko + Michael Emmert6360% gamesnot enough data
Deanna Mao + Rudy Jimenez Vela4256% gamesnot enough data
Deanna Mao + Christopher Kemp134 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro P Andres + Donna Dwyer404 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Mao + Gomes Afonso Paulo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alejandro P Andres
97W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.68
4.5
Aleks Diamond-Stanic
95W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Andrew Schwepfinger
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
Julia Goldman
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Rudy Jimenez Vela
73W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Christopher Kemp
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Sommer
147W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Gomes Afonso Paulo
56W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Donna Dwyer
132W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Michael Emmert
122W–62L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Deanna Mao
110W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Eve Harrison
16W–42L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Karolina Pierko
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.