Teams

Net Assets

2021 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over Spring · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-24vs Kau Belles 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesLenora Spencer / Valerie Pierce vs Draga Dubick / Alice Kau6-1, 6-4
2021-08-15vs Kau Belles 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesLenora Spencer / Michelle Shipley vs Alice Kau / Maria Angelica Camp6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-08vs Davis/ShearerWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Windsor / Kathy Greene vs Valentina di Francesco / Nancy Pinto6-0, 6-3
2021-08-05vs Franda!Split 11
L#1 DoublesOona Schmid / Cecilia-Hien Phan vs Natasha Rones / Ruxandra Badiu0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesZoe Huang / Terri Windsor vs Sarah Thomas / Donna Westervelt6-2, 6-4
2021-07-19vs Davis/ShearerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLenora Spencer / Valerie Pierce vs Randi Goldrich / Behnaz Yalda6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesZoe Huang / Terri Windsor vs Helen Mahoney / Nancy Pinto6-0, 6-2
2021-07-11vs Davis/ShearerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesValerie Pierce / Lenora Spencer vs Kathryn Sampson / Selma Hall6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCecilia-Hien Phan vs Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen0-6, 0-6
2021-06-09vs Franda!Won 10
W#2 DoublesValerie Pierce / Lenora Spencer vs LaMia Jones / Sita Vasan6-3, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Ingrid Turner
published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.92
Kathy Greene
published
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.79
Lenora Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Emily Barry
published 3
2.71
Terri Windsor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Cecilia-Hien Phan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Oona Schmid
published
Valerie Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Jones + Kathy Greene213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ingrid Turner
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kathy Greene
31W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Lenora Spencer
300W–174L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Emily Barry
15W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Terri Windsor
140W–125L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · 2 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Oona Schmid
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Pierce
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.